Skip to content

Bromont, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Bergeron-Jetté

La fondation a pour but de faire des dons à divers organismes de bienfaisance au canada qui promouvoient l'aide aux pauvres l'avancement de l'éducation l'avancement de la santé publique et l'avancement de l'ensemble de la collectivité

C$523k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k7 grants · C$28k
  • C$10k–50k10 grants · C$195k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$300k
C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRE DE DÉPANNAGE DES OEUVRES DE SOEUR MARGUERITE DUBOISC$200,000
FONDATION JULES ET PAUL ÉMILE LÉGERC$50,000
L'ARCHE DE MONTRÉALC$50,000
FONDATION PAPILLONC$30,000
FONDATION DE L'INSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIEC$30,000
FONDATION BMPC$30,000
FONDATION DU CHGC$30,000
FONDATION QUÉBÉCOISE DE LA DÉFICIENCE INTELLECTUELLEC$25,000
FONDATION BUTTERSC$10,000
FONDATION MIRAC$10,000
FIBROSE KYSTIQUE QUÉBECC$10,000
SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA SP DIVISION DU QUÉBECC$10,000
LEUCAN ESTRIEC$10,000
FONDATION DES PETITS FRÈRES DES PAUVRESC$5,000
FONDATION LES NOUVEAUX ÉCUYERC$5,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 87% of grant dollars (C$2.4M). The 13% that went abroad (C$352k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 13% of all-years giving (C$352k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.5M · 27 repeat orgsC$285k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
17

Total granted

C$2.5M
C$275k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+103%

Still filing today

78%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CENTRE DE DÉPANNAGE DES OEUVRES DE SOEUR MARGUERITE DUBOIS
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$577k · revenue +504% · 46% of their budget
  • FB
    FONDATION BMP
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$345k · revenue +81%
  • LD
    L'ARCHE DE MONTRÉAL
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$183k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE
    one grant, 2022 · C$110k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · C$50k
  • FI
    FONDATION INCLUSION
    one grant, 2023 · C$40k · revenue -40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
2
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
3
Fondation de l'hôpital Lasalle

Recueillir et administrer des fonds pour effectuer des dons en équipements à l'hôpital de lasalle afin de renouveler 'équipement médical spécialisé.

—
4
Fondation santé bien-être de l'Est de Montréal

Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…

—
5
Fondation de L'Hopital Marie-Clarac

Améliorer la qualité des soins et des services offerts aux bénéficiaires de l'hôpital marie-clarac en effectuant des dons.

—
6
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
7
La Fondation Santé
—
8
Fondation de l'hôpital Jean-Talon

Contribuer à l'amélioration de la qualité des soins et des services offerts à la clientèle et à la promotion de la santé dans la communauté en soutenant financièrement le développement de l'hôpital jean-talon et du ciusss du…

—
9
Fondation santé et mieux-être Jeanne-Mance

La fondation a pour but de recueillir des fonds destinés à la communauté, à la recherche ainsi qu'à l'amélioration du milieu de vie de la clientèle des centres d'hébergements di CIUSSS du Centre-Sud de l'Ile-de- Montréal.

—
10
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire En SantÉ Mentale De MontrÉAl
—
11
Fondation De L'hotel-Dieu De Montmagny

Promouvoir encourager et soutenir les oeuvres hospitalières scientifiques et humanitaires poursuivies par l'hôpital de montmagny

—
12
Fondation Marcelle et Jean Coutu

Dons à des donataires reconnus.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation De L'institut De Cardiologie De Montreal/Montreal Heart Institute Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Francois-Xavier De Ville Debromont. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRE DE DÉPANNAGE DES OEUVRES DE SOEUR MARGUERITE DUBOIS — C$577,000 over 7y, 46% of budgetFONDATION BMP — C$345,000 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetL'ARCHE DE MONTRÉAL — C$183,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetFONDATION JULES ET PAUL ÉMILE LÉGER — C$170,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetINSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE MONTRÉAL — C$160,052 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ DE RECHERCHE SUR LE CANCER INC. — C$135,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DU CHG — C$100,546 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetFONDATION PAPILLON — C$90,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER DE GRANBY ET RÉGION INC. — C$75,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA SP, DIVISION DU QUÉBEC — C$75,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION MIRA — C$43,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION INCLUSION — C$40,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetFIBROSE KYSTIQUE QUÉBEC — C$33,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$32,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION BUTTERS — C$25,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTEL AIDE — C$20,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetFONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINE — C$18,734 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION AU DIAPASON — C$18,118 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE DES FEMMES DE MONTRÉAL — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFONDATION LES NOUVEAUX ÉCUYER — C$10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetFONDATION BROMIS — C$7,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetFONDATION DES PETITS FRÈRES DES PAUVRES — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSÉE DES BEAUX ARTS — C$4,773 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAROISSE ST-FRANÇOIS XAVIER — C$3,850 over 7y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRE DE DÉPANNAGE DES OEUVRES DE SOEUR MARGUERITE DUBOIS ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION BMP ↗
  • Who funds L'ARCHE DE MONTRÉAL ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION JULES ET PAUL ÉMILE LÉGER ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE MONTRÉAL ↗
  • Who funds SOCIÉTÉ DE RECHERCHE SUR LE CANCER INC. ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION DU CHG ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION PAPILLON ↗
  • Who funds SOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER DE GRANBY ET RÉGION INC. ↗
  • Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA SP, DIVISION DU QUÉBEC ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION MIRA ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION INCLUSION ↗
  • Who funds FIBROSE KYSTIQUE QUÉBEC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION BUTTERS ↗
  • Who funds TEL AIDE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION AU DIAPASON ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION DU CENTRE DES FEMMES DE MONTRÉAL ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION LES NOUVEAUX ÉCUYER ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION BROMIS ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION DES PETITS FRÈRES DES PAUVRES ↗
  • Who funds MUSÉE DES BEAUX ARTS ↗
  • Who funds PAROISSE ST-FRANÇOIS XAVIER ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Philantra Philantra FoundationQC9.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Fondation Mirella & Lino Saputo · Fondation Jean-Luc Gravel Et Brigitte Breton · Fondation Linoit · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation de la famille Zeller · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Fondation St-Hubert · Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Waterloo 2077 · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · The Richter Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 850338740:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Bergeron-Jetté’s filings →