Waterloo, QC · Charitable organization
Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Waterloo 2077
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FABRIQUE SAINT-BERNARDIN | C$600 |
| MAISON DES JEUNES EXIT DE WATERLOO | C$250 |
| BIBLIOTHÈQUE PUBLIQUE WATERLOO | C$250 |
| SOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER GRANBY ET RÉGION | C$250 |
| FONDATION BMP COWANSVILLE | C$150 |
| FONDATION CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE GRANBY | C$150 |
| FONDAION DU DIAPASON | C$150 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$250 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MDMAISON DES JEUNES EXIT7× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +60%
- BPBIBLIOT PUBLIAUX WATERLOO6× · 2017–2022 · C$1k · revenue +226%
- FBFOND BROME MISS.PERKINS7× · 2017–2024 · C$900 · revenue +81%
Funded once
- FTFabriques Trernardinone grant, 2017 · C$600
- BQBIBLIOTHÈ QUE PUBLIQUE WATERLOOone grant, 2023 · C$250
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Recueillir et administrer des fonds pour effectuer des dons en équipements à l'hôpital de lasalle afin de renouveler 'équipement médical spécialisé.
Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…
La fondation finance quelques achats d'équipements du centre hospitalier anna laberge
Organiser des levées de fonds pour acheter des équipements médicaux pour le cisss montérégie-est
Supporter des projets d'acquisition d'équipements médicaux
Promouvoir encourager et soutenir les oeuvres hospitalières scientifiques et humanitaires poursuivies par l'hôpital de montmagny
Organiser des levées de fonds pour acheter des équipements médicaux pour le cisss montérégie-est
Dons et contributions au ciusss de l'est-de-l'île-de-montréal - isntallation de l'hôpital maisonneuve-rosemont
Collecte de fonds pour promouvoir l'exellence des soins à la collectivité et la qualité de vie au centre d'hébergement de saint-eustache au centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux des laurentides par l'acquisition de nouveaux…
Encourager soutenir et améliorer les soins et le développement de la techologie de l'hôpital pierre-boucher.
Soutenir financièrement les acquisitions d'équipements médicaux à la fine pointe de la technoligie de la sécurié du confort en faveur du centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux des îles.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brome-Missisquoi-Perkins Hospital Foundation/Fondation de l'hôpital Brome-Missisquoi-Perkins and the most unlike its peers is Waterloo Public Library Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Fondation Bergeron-Jetté · Fondation Jean-Luc Gravel Et Brigitte Breton · Fondation J Armand Bombardier · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.