Sherbrooke, QC · Charitable organization
Estrie-Aide Inc.
Venir ene aide aux nécessiteux de la région de sherbrooke
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION POUR LES ÉLÈVES DE LA COMMISSION SCOLAIRE DE LA... | C$675 |
| MOISSON ESTRIE | C$500 |
| FONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE SHERBROO... | C$350 |
| FONDATION ESTRIENNE EN ENVIRONNEMENT | C$250 |
| FONDATION CEGEP DE SHERBROOKE | C$205 |
| JEVI CENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE - ESTRIE | C$172 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$955 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FPFONDATION POUR LES ÉLÈVES DE LA COMMISSION SCOLAIRE DE LA...2× · 2023–2024 · C$850 · revenue +16%
- FDFONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE SHERBROO...2× · 2023–2024 · C$490 · revenue -4%
- JCJEVI CENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE - ESTRIE2× · 2023–2024 · C$472 · revenue +18%
Funded once
- FDFONDATION DU BUREAU DES GOUVERNEURSgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$600 · revenue +38%
- FDFONDATION D'AIDE À LA JEUNESSEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$250 · revenue +57%
- CDCentre d'éducation populaire de l'Estriegraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$48 · revenue +51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aide pour certains élèves du centre de service scolaire de l'estuaire
Bourses d'études acquisition d'équipements technologiques développement de projets structurants avancement de l'éducation fonds recherche et développement.
Favoriser le maintien et le développement du séminaire de sherbrooke. favoriser l'accès et le maintien au séminaire de sherbrooke d'élèves ne pouvant pas rencontrer les frais exigés par cette institution d'enseignement.
Campagne de financement et souper bénéfice
La fondation soutient financièrement des activités à vocation scientifique soumises par les enseignants. chaque projet est approuvé par le ca et consolidé dans les procès verbaux.
La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Cégep de Sherbrooke and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FONDATION POUR LES ÉLÈVES DE LA COMMISSION SCOLAIRE DE LA... ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DU BUREAU DES GOUVERNEURS ↗
- Who funds MOISSON ESTRIE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE SHERBROO... ↗
- Who funds JEVI CENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE - ESTRIE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION D'AIDE À LA JEUNESSE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION ESTRIENNE EN ENVIRONNEMENT ↗
- Who funds FONDATION CEGEP DE SHERBROOKE ↗
- Who funds Centre d'éducation populaire de l'Estrie (CEP) ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Universite de Sherbrooke · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.