Sherbrooke, QC · Charitable organization
Église du Mont-Bellevue / Mont-Bellevue Church
L'église du montbellevue tient ses cultes et autres réunions pour l'édufication spirituelle de ses membres.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GROUPE RÉSEAU DES ASSEMBLÉES CHRÉTIENNES ÉVANGÉLIQUES | C$1,257 |
| PRODUCTION ART GOSPEL | C$400 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CNCANADIAN NATIONAL BAPTIST CONVENTION4× · 2017–2020 · C$18k · revenue +45%
- GRGROUPE RÉSEAU DES ASSEMBLÉES CHRÉTIENNES ÉVANGÉLIQUES8× · 2017–2024 · C$14k · revenue +81%
- PDPAROLE DE VIE BÉTHEL6× · 2017–2023 · C$6k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- ACASSEMBLÉE CHRÉTIENNE DE SHAWINIGANgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$300 · revenue +41%
- SGSHAREWOD GLOBAL CANADAone grant, 2021 · C$280 · revenue -2%
- LBLA BIBLE PARLEone grant, 2018 · C$250 · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enseignement biblique évangélisation
Promouvoir la parole de dieu
Vendre des livres religieux à prix réduit dans les pays francophones en afrique et haïtï. faire don de livres chrétiens aux démunis. subventionner la traduction rédaction et édition le livres chrétiens francophone distribuer ces livre dans…
Répandre l'évangile au pays et outre-mer (europe afrique) enseignement biblique par différents cours emissions de radio diffusion conférences
Culte évangélique biblique
Église chrétienne évangélique qui offre des cultes religieux principalement le dimanche de l'enseignement biblique et des oeuvres communautaires de bienfaisance.
Production et distribution de musique chrétienne.
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Faire connaitre la parole de dieu
Évangélisation de la communauté
Organismes missionnaires et propagation de l'évangile
Tenue d'une église
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Groupe réseau des assemblées Chrétiennes évangé and the most unlike its peers is Organisme Renaissance Autochtone. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CANADIAN NATIONAL BAPTIST CONVENTION ↗
- Who funds GROUPE RÉSEAU DES ASSEMBLÉES CHRÉTIENNES ÉVANGÉLIQUES ↗
- Who funds PAROLE DE VIE BÉTHEL ↗
- Who funds PRODUCTION ART GOSPEL ↗
- Who funds ASSEMBLÉE CHRÉTIENNE DE SHAWINIGAN ↗
- Who funds SHAREWOD GLOBAL CANADA ↗
- Who funds GÉDÉONS DU CANADA ↗
- Who funds LA BIBLE PARLE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION NOQ ↗
- Who funds HEURE BONNE NOUVELLE ↗
- Who funds CROSSWORLD INC ↗
- Who funds ORGANISME RENAISSANCE AUTOCHTONE ↗
- Who funds AXE 21 ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Assemblee Chretienne Lamater · Le Groupe Biblique de la Rive Sud · Assemblée évangélique de la Haute-Mauricie · Assemblee Chretienne de Cap-De-La-Madeleine · Assemblée Chrétienne Évangélique de Notre-Dame-du-Nord · Fondation Noq · Le Groupe Biblique de L'Outaouais · Assemblée Évangélique de Ste-Foy · Msc Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.