Quebec, QC · Charitable organization
Assemblée Évangélique de Ste-Foy
(e1) nous dépensons des fonds pour l'entretien de notre lieu de culte.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMP BROCHET | C$6,900 |
| ÉCOLE L'EAU-VIVE | C$4,300 |
| L'HEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE | C$4,300 |
| VILLA DU CARMEL | C$4,100 |
| OPTIONS GROSSESSE | C$2,900 |
| PUBLICATIONS CHRÉTIENNES | C$1,650 |
| CAMP JOLI-B | C$1,600 |
| OMS CANADA | C$1,250 |
| PAROLE DE VIE QUÉBEC | C$1,200 |
| AUJOURD'HUI L'ESPOIR | C$1,100 |
| GROUPE RÉSEAU | C$1,000 |
| CFOI-FM (ASSOCIATION D'ÉGLISES RÉFORMÉES | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -18% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LDL'HEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE8× · 2017–2024 · C$42k · revenue +29%
- CBCAMP BROCHET8× · 2017–2024 · C$33k · revenue +211%
- PDPAROLE DE VIE BETHEL8× · 2017–2024 · C$32k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- ACASSEMBLEE CHRETIENNE DU TEMISCOUATAone grant, 2019 · C$6k
- ACASSEMBLEE CHRÉTIENNE DE BAIE-COMEAUone grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue -18%
- ACASSEMBLEE CHRÉTIENNE DU TEMISCOUATAone grant, 2020 · C$2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Faire connaitre la parole de dieu
Enseignement biblique évangélisation
Évangélisation de la communauté
Promouvoir la parole de dieu
L'organisme est sous la loi des corporation religieuses du québec
Lieu de culte organismes missionnaires évangélisation
Répandre l'évangile au pays et outre-mer (europe afrique) enseignement biblique par différents cours emissions de radio diffusion conférences
Enseignement de la bible prendre soin des gens dans le besoin prendre soin de la jeunesse
Église chrétienne évangélique qui offre des cultes religieux principalement le dimanche de l'enseignement biblique et des oeuvres communautaires de bienfaisance.
Évangélisation par le biais de conférences enseignements livres etc.
Tenue d'une église évangélique
Enseigner la parole de dieu au travers de la bible / évangélisation
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Publications Chretiennes Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Pak Pioneers Community Organization of Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds L'HEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE ↗
- Who funds CAMP BROCHET ↗
- Who funds PAROLE DE VIE BETHEL ↗
- Who funds ÉCOLE L'EAU-VIVE ↗
- Who funds SHAREWORD GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds PUBLICATIONS CHRÉTIENNES ↗
- Who funds OMS CANADA ↗
- Who funds VILLA DU CARMEL ↗
- Who funds AUJOURD'HUI L'ESPOIR ↗
- Who funds CHURCH OF THE MESSIAH ↗
- Who funds OPTIONS GROSSESSE ↗
- Who funds BOURSE DU SAMARITAIN ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION EVANGILE ET ENFANCE ↗
- Who funds GROUPE RÉSEAU ↗
- Who funds ASSEMBLEE CHRÉTIENNE DE BAIE-COMEAU ↗
- Who funds CAMP JOIE DE VIVRE ↗
- Who funds CAMP JOLI-B ↗
- Who funds CFOI-FM (ASSOCIATION D'ÉGLISES RÉFORMÉES ↗
- Who funds ASSEMBLÉE CHRETIENNE DE JONQUIÈRE ↗
- Who funds PIONEER CANADA ↗
- Who funds CROIS-TU ? ↗
- Who funds ART GOSPEL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation Noq · Assemblee Evangelique de la Rive-Sud · Le Groupe Biblique de L'Outaouais · Msc Canada · Assemblée évangélique de la Haute-Mauricie · Groupe réseau des assemblées Chrétiennes évangé · Assemblee Chretienne Bonne Nouvelle · Église Nouvel Horizon · Eglise Chretienne Evangelique de Saint-Juste-De-Bretenieres · Assemblée Chrétienne de Grand'Mère · Église Évangélique de Chicoutimi · Assemblee Chretienne de Cookshire
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.