Drake, SK · Public foundation
Drake & District Donors Choice
The donor's choice program allows the residents of the village of drake and surrounding area to easily donate funds to the charities of their choice.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY - SASK. DIVISION | C$380 |
| SALVATION ARMY | C$320 |
| CANADIAN FOODGRAINS BANK | C$285 |
| HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION OF SASK. | C$220 |
| SASK. PARKINSON'S DISEASE FOUNDATION | C$200 |
| CANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION - SASK. | C$200 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | C$175 |
| MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE | C$165 |
| CANADIAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION | C$160 |
| MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY | C$155 |
| ALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF SASK. INC. | C$155 |
| CANADIAN RED CROSS | C$140 |
| INCLUSION SASKATCHEWAN (FORMERLY ASSOC. FOR | C$135 |
| CANADIAN BIBLE SOCIETY | C$125 |
| ARTHRITIS SOCIETY - SASK. DIVISION | C$120 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CFCanadian Foodgrains Bank4× · 2017–2020 · C$1k · revenue +103%
- SASalvation Army4× · 2017–2020 · C$1k · revenue ×11
- CCCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY - SASK. DIVISION4× · 2017–2020 · C$1k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- CRCanadian Red Crossone grant, 2017 · C$110
- NSNorth Star Churchone grant, 2018 · C$10
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advancing the health of Canadians by enabling the detection prevention and control of high blood pressure and its complications. Hypertension Canada delivers against its mission/vision by striving for excellence in three core service…
The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…
The Canada Safety Council is Canada's National Not-for-profit Safety Organization. Our mission is to lead the national effort to reduce death injurie and economic loss caused by accidents and health hazards in traffic at work at home and…
In Canada researchers figure prominently in the development of innovative and very promising clinical trials. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) is the first and only national organization bringing together Canada's leading cancer…
The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…
Autism Speaks Canada is dedicated to promoting solutions across the spectrum and throughout the lifespan for the needs of individuals with autism and their families by supporting and working with community partners enhancing resources and…
Assisting provincial Alzheimer Society (AS) organizations to provide information and educational materials to the public; Administering and funding the AS national peer-reviewed research grants and awards program; Creating public awareness…
The mental health commission of canada (mhcc) shines a light on mental health and works to improve the lives of people who experience mental health problems and illnesses (as well as their families and caregivers). mhcc convenes…
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CANADA (MDC) provides direct support to Canadians affected by Neuromuscular disorders that include: offering emotional support for adapting and coping to Canadians living with a neuromuscular disorder or caring for an…
Cooperation Canada is Canada's national association of international development and humanitarian organizations. Cooperation Canada brings together and advocates for effective Canadian international development assistance by convening…
Knowledge hub for families and persons on the autism spectrum; influencing public at the national level; collaboration with provincial and territorial associations to share best practices and increase fundraising capacity through national…
Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) is the provincial government agency responsible for driving health system performance improvement for Ontario's cancer and chronic kidney disease health systems. CCO also supports achievement of Ontario's Wait…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Societe De L'arthrite Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Hemochromatosis Society/Societe Canadienne De L'hemochromatose. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Canadian Foodgrains Bank ↗
- Who funds Salvation Army ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY - SASK. DIVISION ↗
- Who funds MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds Canadian Bible Society ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION - SASK. ↗
- Who funds LANIGAN PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
- Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Alzheimer Society of Sask. Inc. ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Teen Challenge Saskatchewan ↗
- Who funds Arthritis Society - Sask. Division ↗
- Who funds UNICEF CANADA ↗
- Who funds INCLUSION SASKATCHEWAN (FORMERLY ASSOC. FOR ↗
- Who funds KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF CANADA - SASK. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Saskatoon and Area · Churchbridge and District Donors Choice · The Maryfield and District Donor's Choice · Carlyle and District Donors Choice · Edam and District Donors Choice Combined Appeal Committee · United Way of Regina · Milden and District Combined Appeal Donors Choice · Wynyard and District Combined Appeal · Elbow & Community Donors Choice Organization · Gainsborough and District Donor's Choice · Milestone Donors Choice Combined Appeal · Gull Lake & District Donors Choice Appeal
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.