Skip to content

North York, ON · Private foundation

Daniel Westreich Family Charitable Foundation

Selection of and disbursements to qualified donees

C$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$19k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k21 grants · C$19k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$19k
C$360
Median grant
—
Regions reached
—
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MY CHARITY FUNDC$18,500
CONGREGATION SHOAVEI MAYIMC$6,488
TORONTO CARE FUNDC$3,600
BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$1,800
CANADIAN FRIEND SOF YAD ELIEZERC$1,200
YESHIVA NEFESH DOVIDC$1,000
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$750
TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF TORONTOC$720
YESHIVA YESODEI HATORAHC$500
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$500
YESHIVA MISHKAN YOSEFC$360
MISASKIM CANADAC$360
EITZ CHAIM SCHOOLSC$360
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE SEMINARY YESHIVA MIRER OFC$360
THE TORONTO CHEDERC$250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$69k · 13 repeat orgsC$17k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
17

Total granted

C$69k
C$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$7k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MY CHARITY FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$23k · revenue +17%
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHOAVEI MAYIM
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$13k · revenue +5%
  • J
    JHF
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$11k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • KT
    KOLLEL TORAS MOSHE
    one grant, 2023 · C$4k · revenue +6%
  • J
    JHF
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k
  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMRAYAHU
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
3
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
4
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
5
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
7
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
8
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
9
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
10
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
11
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
12
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Les Amis Canadiens Du Seminaire Yeshivah Mirer De Jerusalem Inc./Canadian Friends of the Seminary Yeshivah Mirer of Jerusalem and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
20/38
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMY CHARITY FUND — C$23,180 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATION SHOAVEI MAYIM — C$12,873 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJHF — C$11,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBYES — C$9,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTORONTO CHEDER — C$3,868 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTORONTO CARE FUND — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEL TORAS MOSHE — C$3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVAS NEFESH DOVID — C$2,360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPATHS OF TORAH SCHOOL/YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH — C$1,330 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIEND SOF YAD ELIEZER — C$1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMRAYAHU — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOV — C$860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF TORONTO — C$838 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE SEMINARY YESHIVA MIRER OF — C$540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLOH TORONTO — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL BEIS HILLEL — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL — C$405 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SMALL WONDERS CHARITABLE ORD. — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKESHER YISROEL — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSISHEL — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTORONTO BROTHERS OF MERCY — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA MISHKAN YOSEF — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP AGUDAH — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CANADA — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACS — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHACHNOSAS KALLAH OF TORONTO — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCSY — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF THORNHILL — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE SOCIETY OF CANADA — C$180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF TZEDAKAH MEIR BAAL HANESS OF JERUSALEM — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetP'EYLIM OF CANADA — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO SHIDDUCH INITIATIVE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHLAS ZVI — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE CANADA — C$72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT INSPIRE CANADA — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHEL SARAH CANADA — C$45 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zolty Charitable FoundationON21.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zolty Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Ari and Naomi Klein Charitable Trust · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The S & L Stern Foundation · The Rothschild Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 777914417:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Daniel Westreich Family’s filings →