Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Saint-Laurent, QC · Charitable organization

Communaute Sepharade de Ville St-Laurent

Activités religeuses organisation des offices religieux organisation des fêtes et célebrations religieuse.

C$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$24k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$24,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$24,450
C.S.U.QC$24,000
FONDATION SEPHARADE KOLLEL AVRECHIMC$18,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$445k · 5 repeat orgsC$64k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

C$445k
C$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+70%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    C.S.U.Q
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$120k · revenue +25%
  • ZC
    ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$118k · revenue +21%
  • KK
    KOLLEL KESER TORAH
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$18k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • CB
    CAISSE BETH YOSSEF
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k · revenue -4%
  • LF
    LA FONDATION DES TALMUD TORAHS UNIS DE MONTREAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue +412%
  • CS
    Chasdei Shlomo Tzedakahgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$8k · revenue ×39 · 48% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
2
Communauté Sepharade Hekhal Shalom

Synagogue

—
3
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
4
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
5
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
6
École juive sepharadic/the sepharadic cheder

Soutien et rapprochement de la jeunesse a la religion juive

—
7
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
8
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
9
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
10
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
11
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
12
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation and the most unlike its peers is Vmm Zichron Chaim Charity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetC.S.U.Q — C$120,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$118,413 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCAISSE BETH YOSSEF — C$20,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFONDATION SEPHARADE KOLLEL AVRECHIM — C$18,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKOLLEL KESER TORAH — C$17,900 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetECOLE MAIMONIDE — C$16,822 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLA FONDATION DES TALMUD TORAHS UNIS DE MONTREAL INC — C$10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetChasdei Shlomo Tzedakah — C$8,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetCongrégation Beth Chabad C.S.L. — C$4,680 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZRAS ACHIM CONGREGATION OF BROTHERLY HELP — C$750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNAUTE SEPHARADE DE LAVAL — C$550 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION DE L'ECOLE MAIMONIDE — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Rayjo Charitable TrustFondation Miryam Berd…Fondation de la Famil…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Fondation Famille Nez…Centre chabadVMM Zichron Chaim Cha…Institut CBMGad and Sandra Bitton…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Federation Cja
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC12.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Fondation Miryam Berdugo Cohen · Fondation de la Famille Nataf/Nataf Family Foundation · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Fondation Famille Nezri · Centre chabad · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Institut CBM · Gad and Sandra Bitton Family Foundation · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Federation Cja

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 106960784:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Communaute Sepharade de Ville St-Laurent’s filings →