Skip to content
Canadian charities

Saint-Gabriel-De-Rimouski, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Gabriel-De-Rimo

1 lieux de cultes congrégations paroisses diocèse etc...

C$8k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOURS TIERS-MONDEC$2,203
FABRIQUE DE ST-CHARLES GARNIERC$2,000
FABRIQUE DE ST-DONATC$1,000
FABRIQUE DE ST-GABRIEL DE RIMOUSKIC$1,000
FABRIQUE DE ST-FRANÇOIS XAVIER DE LES HAUTEURSC$1,000
LA FONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE LE MISTRALC$200
MIRAC$100
FONDATION DU CHRRC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$29k · 13 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

C$29k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+9%

Still filing today

92%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE ST-CHARLES GARNIER
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$6k · revenue +63%
  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE ST-DONAT
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$5k · revenue +3%
  • ST
    SECOURS TIERS-MONDE
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$3k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CM
    CENTRE MISSIONNAIRE DES AUXILIAIRES FRANCISCAINES
    one grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue -92%
  • CD
    CORPORATION DU VILLAGES DES SOURCES
    one grant, 2020 · C$500 · revenue -14%
  • UD
    Unité Domremy St-Gabriel Relais Communautaire
    one grant, 2017 · C$300 · 31% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Sainte-Marguerite
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-CÉSaire
—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Du Saint-Nom-De-Marie
—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Famille
—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De St-Germain
—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Marcel (L'islet)
—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix
—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Maria-Goretti
—
10
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Angelique
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-De-La-Salette
—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Edouard
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is L'association Du Cancer De L'est Du Quebec and the most unlike its peers is The Children's Wish Foundation of Canada/La Fondation Canadienne Reves D'enfants. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFABRIQUE DE ST-CHARLES GARNIER — C$6,050 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetFABRIQUE DE SAINT-GABRIEL — C$6,010 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetFABRIQUE DE ST-FRANÇOIS XAVIER DE LES HAUTEURS — C$5,085 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetFABRIQUE DE ST-DONAT — C$4,585 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetSECOURS TIERS-MONDE — C$3,243 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRE MISSIONNAIRE DES AUXILIAIRES FRANCISCAINES — C$2,333 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFONDATION DU CSS DE LA MITIS — C$750 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMAISON MARIE-ELISABETH — C$750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFondation du Centre Hospitalier Regional de Rimouski — C$700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLA FONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE LE MISTRAL — C$674 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetL'Arrimage — C$600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION DU VILLAGES DES SOURCES — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAssociation du Cancer de l'Est du Québec — C$410 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLA LUEUR DE L'ESPOIR DU BAS ST- LAURENT — C$325 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUnité Domremy St-Gabriel Relais Communautaire — C$300 over 1y, 31% of budgetMIRA — C$225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnité Domremy Mont-Joli — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFÉDÉRATION QUÉBÉCOIS DE L'AUTISME — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFondation Rêves D'Enfants — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFavrique Notre-Dame de Lourdes Mont-Joli — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAssociation Pulmonaire du Québec — C$15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Québec Cha…Union Canadienne des …Fonds de Bienfaisance…Comite Des Oeuvres Ch…Fondation Maurice Tan…Oeuvres Caritatives D…Province de Saint-Jos…TELUS Friendly Future…Charitable Gift Funds…United Way East Ontar…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…
Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurentQC8.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Union Canadienne des Moniales de l'Ordre de Sainte-Ursule · Fonds de Bienfaisance Du Club Lion de Rimouski · Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Rimouski 2843-46 · Fondation Maurice Tanguay Inc. · Oeuvres Caritatives Des Filles de Jesus Canada · Province de Saint-Joseph des servantes du Saint-Coeur de Marie · TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 890775794:2022-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Gabriel-De-Rimo’s filings →