Rimouski, QC · Charitable organization
Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Rimouski 2843-46
Corps cadets (2686) bourses d'étude déchecheurs org humanitaires ( cancer coeur croix rouge...)
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAISON MARIE ELIZABETH | C$1,370 |
| FABRIQUE LES HAUTEURS | C$1,000 |
| VILLAGE DES SOURPES | C$1,000 |
| L'ARRIMAGE | C$800 |
| ACEIL | C$750 |
| ACCUEIL MATERNITÉ | C$750 |
| PRO JEUNE EST | C$600 |
| FABRIQUE ST-GERMAIN | C$577 |
| CENTRE ACTION BÉNÉVOLE | C$500 |
| FONDATION CHRR | C$400 |
| CORPS DE CADETS | C$330 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$300 |
| MALADIES DU COEUR | C$200 |
| LA CROIX ROUGE | C$200 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CDCENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLES7× · 2017–2023 · C$4k · revenue +46%
- FFOND.PRO-JEUNE-EST4× · 2017–2020 · C$2k · revenue +96%
- MMMAISON MARIE-ELIZABETH2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- FSFabrique St-Germain (5 paroisses)one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +24%
- VDVILLAGE DES SOURCESgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$900 · revenue +181%
- PJPRO JEUNE ESTone grant, 2022 · C$900
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is L'association Du Cancer De L'est Du Quebec and the most unlike its peers is La Fabrique De La Paroisse De St-Germain. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLES ↗
- Who funds Fabrique St-Germain (5 paroisses) ↗
- Who funds FOND.PRO-JEUNE-EST ↗
- Who funds MAISON MARIE-ELIZABETH ↗
- Who funds FABRIQUE LES HAUTEURS ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE DES SOURCES ↗
- Who funds ACEQ ↗
- Who funds ACCUEIL MATENITE ↗
- Who funds MALADIE DU COEUR ↗
- Who funds Soc. Can. Cancer ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oeuvres Caritatives Des Filles de Jesus Canada · Fonds de Bienfaisance Du Club Lion de Rimouski · Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Gabriel-De-Rimo · Union Canadienne des Moniales de l'Ordre de Sainte-Ursule · Union Canadienne Des Moniales de L'Ordre de Saint Ursule · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Telus Employees Charitable Trust · TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.