Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Chessed Chain

To provide assistance to needy people

C$1k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,300
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLEL OF CONGR. BELZC$1,300
02Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
2
Ezrat Mehabrim

Issued scholarships for religious education

—
3
Hatzolas Yisroel D'arizal

To advance education by providing scholarships and financial assistance to students at mosdos belz school in israel. to relieve poverty by providing financial assistance and interest-free loans to the poor. and to undertake activities…

—
4
Gemach Zichron Burech Zvi

Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees

—
5
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
6
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
7
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
8
Chevrah Msamchei Lev

To assist in the care of needy people.

—
9
Halachic Academy Ravad

Provides research grants for talmudic study; operate an orthodox jewish synagogue

—
10
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
11
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
12
Reb Mayer Baal Hanes - Chibas Jerusalem

Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Association Merkaz Hachinuch and the most unlike its peers is Rav Chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCDN FRIENDS OF MOSOOS BELZ — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz — C$3,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMaharam Tav Fund — C$1,393 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY CENTER — C$1,150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY SCHOOL — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAV CHESED — C$810 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEKAZ HACHINUCH — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kehilas Belz / Regroupement communautaire BelzQC11.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kehilas Belz / Regroupement communautaire Belz · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Belz Community Center · Menucha Vesimcha · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Bnot Jerusalem Kindergarten and Girls' School Bnot Jérusalem Garderie Et École Pour Jeunes Filles · Communauté Détenteurs Religieux Belza / CDRB / Kehal Machzikei Hadas Belz / KMHB · Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz · Institution Viznitz / Viznitz Institution · Centre chabad

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2020-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2020. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2022) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 859622326:2020-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Chessed Chain’s filings →