Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Chabad of Danforth-Beaches

Promote and advance the spiritual teachings of the Jewish faith by practicing the religious observances tenets & doctrines associated with that faith.

C$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$154
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$203k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bais ChomeshC$10,000
Chabad on the AvenueC$154
02Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBais Chaya Mushkah School for girls — C$33,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSHMUELZAHAVYCHEDERCHABADSCHOOL — C$12,376 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBais Chomesh — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMifal Klita — C$4,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMizrachi of Canada — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChabad Niagara — C$627 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChabad on the Avenue — C$254 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rappaport Family Charitable FoundationON10.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rappaport Family Charitable Foundation · Jewish Russian Speaking Community of Toronto · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Chabad Lubavitch of the Waterloo Region · Chabad Lubavitch of Richmond Hill · Chabad of Midtown · My Charity Fund · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Chabad Lubavitch of Downtown Toronto · Chabad of Maple Inc. · Agudat Chasidei Chabad-Ontario · Rhoda and Herb Singer Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 846194157:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Chabad of Danforth-Beaches’ filings →