Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

North York, ON · Charitable organization

Bikur Cholim

(a) to supply and render services of a charitable nature to poor and needy persons; (b) to establish training and educational centres and to train poor and needy persons in gainful trades professions and occupations with a view to enabling such persons to become self-supporting; (c) to give donations for charitable or patriotic…

C$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$16k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$9k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$30k
C$2,100
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTEC$16,350
DANI DEVELOPING AND NURTURING INDEPENDENCEC$13,500
ABC-ASSISTING BLOSSOMING CHILDRENC$6,000
BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$2,100
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$750
AQUDATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION OF TORONTOC$330
YESHIVA B'NEI ZION OF TORONTOC$300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$117k · 8 repeat orgsC$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

C$117k
C$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+5%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • DD
    DANI DEVELOPING AND NURTURING INDEPENDENCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$50k · revenue +23%
  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$29k · revenue +24%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$15k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$10k · revenue +92%
  • KH
    KUPAS HECHESED MEOROTH
    one grant, 2020 · C$3k
  • YN
    YESHIVAS NEFESH DOVID
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
3
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
4
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
5
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
6
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
7
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
8
Mesorah Montessori School

Advance the teachings of the jewish faith religious tenets and doctrines.

—
9
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
10
Yeshiva of Hamilton

Religious school

—
11
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
12
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora and the most unlike its peers is The Hospital for Sick Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDANI DEVELOPING AND NURTURING INDEPENDENCE — C$49,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE — C$29,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$14,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — C$7,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetABC-ASSISTING BLOSSOMING CHILDREN — C$6,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetYESHIVE B'NEI SION OF TORONTO — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDAS ISRAEL CONGREGATION OF TORONTO — C$5,330 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKUPAS HECHESED MEOROTH — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS CHAYA — C$2,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS NEFESH DOVID — C$1,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN — C$1,804 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF TZEDAKAH MEIR BAAL HANESS OF JERUSALEM — C$1,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTORONTO CHEDER — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT RESODEI HATORA — C$1,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVI — C$1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS LIMUDEI HASHEM SOCIETY — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel and Vera R…The Friedberg Charita…My Charity FundThe Dan-Hytman Family…Linas Tzedek Charitab…Schofam Charitable Fo…Mae Day FoundationJack and Doris Bistri…The George Hofstedter…The Chaim Moshe Fried…Zichron Binyomin Char…The F&R Hauer Charita…
The Daniel and Vera Rubinstein Charitable FoundationON10.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel and Vera Rubinstein Charitable Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · The Dan-Hytman Family Foundation · Linas Tzedek Charitable Foundation · Schofam Charitable Foundation · Mae Day Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 133048645:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bikur Cholim’s filings →