Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Bais Yaakov Elementary School

Operating an elementary and junior high school offering both secular and not secular courses and programs.

C$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$39k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$18k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$63k
C$8,550
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTEC$39,499
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$23,524
THE TORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLELC$8,550
YESHIVA GEDOLA ZICHRON SHMAYAHUC$5,176
YESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVIC$4,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$610k · 13 repeat orgsC$178k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

C$610k
C$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+27%

Still filing today

92%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$72k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • YY
    YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA
    3× · 2018–2023 · C$44k · revenue +51%
  • BJ
    BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2021 · C$26k · revenue +18%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$24k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • EA
    EZRAT ACHIM
    one grant, 2022 · C$28k · revenue -6%
  • AT
    ACHIM TORONTOgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k · revenue +99%
  • MC
    MY CHARITY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · C$11k · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
3
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
4
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
5
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
6
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
7
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
8
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
9
Torah Research Academy

To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders

—
10
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
11
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
12
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Talmudical Academy of Toronto Mishkan HaTorah Charitable Trust and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBYS EDUCATIONAL CENTRE — C$401,973 over 3y, 18% of budgetYESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA — C$44,175 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE — C$39,499 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$30,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEZRAT ACHIM — C$27,920 over 1y, 15% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$26,316 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$23,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$23,524 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYESHIVA B'NEI ZION OF TORONTO — C$21,757 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetACHIM TORONTO — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU — C$14,551 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL — C$10,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMY CHARITY FUND — C$10,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHLAS ZVI — C$10,400 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVATH BETH ABRAHAM SLONIM JE — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBEIS MEIR — C$8,795 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLEL — C$8,550 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONGREGATION TEHILOS YISROEL — C$7,600 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPATHS OF TORAH — C$7,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBNOS CHAYA — C$7,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKOLLEL YISMACH MOSHE — C$5,652 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TORONTO CHEDER — C$5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION CHASIDEI BOBOV — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVAS MISHKAN HATORAH — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYACHAD THE CANADIAN JEWISH COUNCIL FOR DISABILITIES — C$3,220 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE SEMINARY YESHIVAH MIRER OF J — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED TALMUDIC AND HALACHIC STUDIES — C$1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TORONTO LAKEWOOD MINYAN — C$1,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHOMRAI SHABOTH-SHEVRAH MISHNAYOTH CONGREGATION — C$1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHATZOLAH TORAH — C$900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEL OHR YOSEF — C$835 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEITZ CHAIM DAY SCHOOL — C$220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHACHNOSAS KALLAH — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Heitner Charitable Fo…The B&C Zy Gezunt Cha…Moral Arc FoundationThe F&R Hauer Charita…The M & J Charitable …The Mesora Charitable…My Charity FundJ & H Feldman Charita…Schofam Charitable Fo…The C & K Jakubovic F…The Koenig Family Fou…Jack and Doris Bistri…
Heitner Charitable FoundationON14.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Heitner Charitable Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · The M & J Charitable Trust · The Mesora Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · Schofam Charitable Foundation · The C & K Jakubovic Family Charitable Trust · The Koenig Family Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 129800884:2024-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Bais Yaakov Elementary School’s filings →