Quebec, QC · Charitable organization
Assemblee Chretienne Bonne Nouvelle
Rassemblement hebdomadaire pour l'étude de la bible le partage la prière les chants de louange et la sainte- scène.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k10 grants · C$17k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LES NAVIGATEURS | C$10,700 |
| JEUNESSE EN MISSION | C$5,850 |
| CAMP BROCHET | C$2,300 |
| WYCLIFFE | C$2,100 |
| ÉCOLE L'EAU VIVE | C$1,750 |
| TWR CANADA | C$1,500 |
| VILLA DU CARMEL | C$1,000 |
| HBN | C$1,000 |
| FONDATION DOMINIC MOISAN | C$1,000 |
| AUJOURD'HUI L'ESPOIR | C$500 |
| NOTRE PAIN QUOTIDIEN | C$300 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LNLes Navigateurs8× · 2017–2024 · C$65k · revenue +8%
- FGFONDATION GILLES KÈGLE5× · 2019–2024 · C$25k · revenue +176%
- CBCamp Brochet8× · 2017–2024 · C$14k · revenue +211%
Funded once
- OGOPTIONS GROSSESSEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$1k · revenue +69%
- FDFondation de l'université Laval (Institut de missionologie)one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -99%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Production du magazine et de la revue 'le verbe' podcast 'on n'est pas du monde' podcast 'verbomoteur'
Avancement de la religion
Enseignement de la bible prendre soin des gens dans le besoin prendre soin de la jeunesse
Promouvoir l'éducation la santé et la propagation de la foi au canada et dans les pays à l'étranger.
Évangélisation de la communauté
Vendre des livres religieux à prix réduit dans les pays francophones en afrique et haïtï. faire don de livres chrétiens aux démunis. subventionner la traduction rédaction et édition le livres chrétiens francophone distribuer ces livre dans…
Promouvoir l'éducation sexuelle chez les jeunes
Évangélisation par le biais de conférences enseignements livres etc.
1) émissions chrétiennes radiophoniques ; 2) émissions chrétiennes sur internet - auditives (mp3) et visuelles (mp4); 3) messages téléphoniques à caractère religieux.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jeunesse En Mission (Québec) inc. and the most unlike its peers is Organisme Renaissance Autochtone. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Les Navigateurs ↗
- Who funds FONDATION GILLES KÈGLE ↗
- Who funds Camp Brochet ↗
- Who funds JEUNESSE EN MISSION ↗
- Who funds ÉCOLE L'EAU VIVE ↗
- Who funds HEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE ↗
- Who funds TWR Canada ↗
- Who funds Wicliffe ↗
- Who funds Camp Villa du Carmel ↗
- Who funds Organisme Renaissance Autochtone ↗
- Who funds Aujourd'hui l'espoir ↗
- Who funds OPTIONS GROSSESSE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DOMINIC MOISAN ↗
- Who funds Fondation de l'université Laval (Institut de missionologie) ↗
- Who funds NOTRE PAIN QUOTIDIEN ↗
- Who funds Centre Culturel Islamique de Québec ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Assemblée Évangélique de Ste-Foy · Assemblee Evangelique de la Rive-Sud · Le Groupe Biblique de la Rive Sud · Église Nouvel Horizon · Alliance Chrétienne et missionnaire au Québec · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.