Rouyn-Noranda, QC · Charitable organization
Assemblée Chrétienne de Rouyn-Noranda
Nous offrons des services d'enseignement biblique et évangilique aux femmes aux hommes aux adolescentes et aux enfants à toutes les semaines.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GROUPE RESEAU DES ASSEMBLÉES CHRÉTIENNES | C$4,000 |
| PUBLICATIONS CHRÉTIENNES | C$2,000 |
| CAMP JOLI-B INC | C$1,500 |
| SHAREWOOD GLOBAL (GÉDÉONS) | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- GRGROUPE RESEAU DES ASSEMBLÉES CHRÉTIENNES7× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +81%
- PCPUBLICATIONS CHRÉTIENNES5× · 2020–2024 · C$8k · revenue +49%
- CJCAMP JOLI-B INC5× · 2020–2024 · C$7k · revenue +121%
Funded once
- TVTHE VOICE OF MARTYRSone grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -13%
- AÉASSOCIATION ÉGLISE RÉFORMÉE BAPTISTE DU QUÉBECone grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue +9%
- PDPAROLE DE VIE BETHELone grant, 2019 · C$650
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Évangélisation de la communauté
Enseignement biblique évangélisation
Église chrétienne évangélique qui offre des cultes religieux principalement le dimanche de l'enseignement biblique et des oeuvres communautaires de bienfaisance.
Proclamer l'évangile de jésus-christ à tous.
Organiser administrer et maintenir une église évangélique et proclamer l'évangile de jésus-christ à tous les hommes employer envoyer et diriger des missionnaires. établir donner des cours de formation religieuse. imprimer publier vendre et…
Établir une assemblée chrétienne locale en conformité avec les enseignements de la bible tels que nous les comprenons et croyons.
Faire connaitre la parole de dieu
Proclamer l'évangile de jésus- christ promouvoir la foi chrétienne par l'entremise d'enseignements bibliques ainsi que par la publication de livres et de littérature chrétienne.
Tenue d'une église
Culte évangélique biblique
Rencontres avec les membres évangélisaiton conférences séminaires et formation chrétienne conseilling.
Promouvoir la parole de dieu
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assemblée Chrétienne Évangélique de Notre-Dame-du-Nord and the most unlike its peers is Camp Joli-B Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GROUPE RESEAU DES ASSEMBLÉES CHRÉTIENNES ↗
- Who funds PUBLICATIONS CHRÉTIENNES ↗
- Who funds CAMP JOLI-B INC ↗
- Who funds SHAREWORD GLOBAL (GÉDÉONS) ↗
- Who funds SOLA ↗
- Who funds THE VOICE OF MARTYRS ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION ÉGLISE RÉFORMÉE BAPTISTE DU QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds ASSEMBLÉE CHRÉTIENNE DE SHAWINIGAN ↗
- Who funds Assemblée chrétienne de Rollet ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation Noq · Assemblée évangélique de la Haute-Mauricie · Assemblée Évangélique de Ste-Foy · Msc Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.