Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

North York, ON · Charitable organization

Achim Toronto

Aiding in the relief of poverty by assisting families with basic needs such as clothing and education costs

C$36k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$11k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k12 grants · C$24k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
C$1,810
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$11,365
BNOS BAIS YAAKOVC$9,150
BETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTOC$3,000
KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTEC$3,000
YESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVIC$2,500
BNOS CHAYAC$2,150
YESHIVAS YESODEI HATORAHC$1,810
MAAYANOS TORAHC$1,000
CHASDEI RIVKAC$660
CONG BOBOVC$450
TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF TORONTO MISHKAN HATORAH CHARITABLEC$300
YESHIVAS MISHKAN YOSEFC$250
CHAI LIFELINE (CANADA) INC.C$215
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$39k · 6 repeat orgsC$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

C$39k
C$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+16%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$19k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BNOS BAIS YAAKOV
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$11k · revenue +8%
  • YY
    YESHIVAS YESODEI HATORAH
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$9k · revenue +25%
  • HH
    HEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA
    2× · 2021–2023 · C$5k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +16%
  • KY
    KESHER YISRAEL
    one grant, 2022 · C$500 · revenue -31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
3
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
4
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
5
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
Beth Jacob High School for Girls

To provide an excellent school system for jewish girls to follow the jewish orthodox tradition.

—
7
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
8
Mesorah Montessori School

Advance the teachings of the jewish faith religious tenets and doctrines.

—
9
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
10
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
11
Yeshivas Nefesh Dovid

The organization operates a religious jewish high school for deaf and hearing impaired students who desire a religious jewish education and who are unable to attend or would have great difficulty attending a conventional religious jewish…

—
12
Torah Research Academy

To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Mishkan Yosef and the most unlike its peers is Chai Lifeline (Canada) Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
6/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — C$11,365 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV — C$10,950 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVAS YESODEI HATORAH — C$9,256 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU — C$5,085 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$5,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONG BOBOV — C$4,560 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBNOS CHAYA — C$4,180 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTO — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVI — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAAYANOS TORAH — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHASDEI RIVKA — C$660 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKESHER YISRAEL — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF TORONTO MISHKAN HATORAH CHARITABLE — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS MISHKAN YOSEF — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE (CANADA) INC. — C$215 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fieldgate Cares Found…Philip and Hannah Rei…The Jewish Legacy Cha…The Rothschild Charit…Jack and Doris Bistri…My Charity FundThe George Hofstedter…The Friedberg Charita…The Chaim Moshe Fried…Zichron Binyomin Char…The F&R Hauer Charita…Heitner Charitable Fo…
Fieldgate Cares FoundationON10.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Philip and Hannah Reichmann Family Foundation · The Jewish Legacy Charitable Foundation · The Rothschild Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 776916132:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Achim Toronto’s filings →