Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

A.M. Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom time to time to charitable organization that are also registered charities under the income tax act.

C$233k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$108k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k21 grants · C$41k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$84k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$108k
C$1,800
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KAV SHALOMC$108,230
BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$37,983
KASHRUTH COUNCILC$36,000
TORONTO CARE FUNDC$10,000
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$7,000
BNOS CHAYAC$5,415
IATHSC$5,400
NETIVOT HATORAHC$5,300
TORATH EMETH JEWISH CENTREC$3,600
BETH MEDRASH GOVOHAC$3,600
YESHIVA GEDOLAHC$2,000
MISASKIM CANADAC$1,800
CDN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT MIRC$1,800
AHAVAS TORAHC$1,080
HATZOLOH TORONTOC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$631k · 22 repeat orgsC$312k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
18

Total granted

C$631k
C$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+20%

Still filing today

91%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$131k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$93k · revenue +423%
  • KC
    KASHRUTH COUNCIL
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$72k · revenue +16%
  • BY
    BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$66k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOMIgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$100k · revenue +468%
  • MF
    MAIEROVITS FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDA
    one grant, 2023 · C$54k · revenue -9% · 26% of their budget
  • JC
    JNF CANADAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$12k · revenue +45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
2
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
3
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
4
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
5
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
6
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
7
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
8
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
9
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
10
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
11
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
12
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesivta Lubavitch Toronto and the most unlike its peers is Charity Intelligence Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/48
Grantees still filing
26/48
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$259,070 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKAV SHALOM — C$108,230 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI — C$100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$92,660 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKASHRUTH COUNCIL — C$72,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — C$66,268 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMAIEROVITS FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDA — C$54,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetIATHS — C$41,900 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTORAH EMETH — C$37,963 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER — C$18,950 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJNF CANADA — C$12,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTORONTO CARE FUND — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAIC STUDIES — C$8,560 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNETIVOT HATORAH — C$7,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS CHAYA — C$5,415 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetZICHRON BINYOMIN CHARITY FOUNDATION — C$3,899 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF LERET — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS MEIR — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH — C$3,170 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKH MEOROTH — C$2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV — C$2,538 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH — C$2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAS TORAH — C$2,040 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHATZOLOH TORONTO — C$1,860 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISASKIM CANADA — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCDN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT MIR — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTENT CITY JEWISH CONG — C$1,726 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL TORONTO — C$1,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMESIVTA LUBAVITCH — C$1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTENT CITY CONGREGATION — C$1,560 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChai Lifeline — C$1,540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCaribou Torah Education foundation — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAH TORAS CHAIM — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAAYANOS TORAH — C$978 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHAAREI SHOMAYIM CONGREGATION — C$657 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED HATZALAH CANADA — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHachnosos Kallah — C$360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSmall Wonders — C$250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSDOS BOBOV — C$120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSDOS BOBOV — C$120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTING BLOSSOMING CHILDREN — C$100 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHABAD FLAMIGO — C$36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEDBURY JEWISH CENTRE — C$36 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BAYCREST CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEGINEI CHANA — C$25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Koenig Family FoundationON19.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Koenig Family Foundation · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · The Rothschild Charitable Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 810051003:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on A.M.’s filings →