Loading…
Loading…
Minnesota · Nonprofit
FERGUS FALLS COMMUNITY CHILD CARE (Minnesota) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $33,451 in grants to it, the largest being Think Small ($13,638). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
FERGUS FALLS COMMUNITY CHILD CARE is better cushioned than half of the 14,360 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,360 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2019
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
49% of FERGUS FALLS COMMUNITY CHILD CARE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (87% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.
$6k from 1 funders in 2024, up from $7k and 1 in 2019.
1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 22% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of FERGUS FALLS COMMUNITY CHILD CARE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
FERGUS FALLS COMMUNITY CHILD CARE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2021 54% · 2023 100% · 2024 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
FERGUS FALLS COMMUNITY CHILD CARE is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Minnesota funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
88% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2019 (financials across 2018–2019), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing