How much did UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

sectioncodemilitaryconstruction industryinternal revenue

2023

sectioncodemilitaryconstruction industryinternal revenue

2024

sectioncodemilitaryconstruction industryinternal revenue

2025

militaryconstruction industry

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $16k
$10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$50k–250k1 grant · $53k

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$54M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE$52,750
ROOFERS LOCAL UNION 189$30,000
CMRAVE$8,500
CHICAGO ROOFERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 7%. 88% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$834k · 7 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$834k

$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%

+29%

Still filing today

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyEnvironmentEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

US
UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE
8× · 2018–2025 · $394k · revenue +6%
RL
ROOFERS LOCAL UNION 189
8× · 2018–2025 · $240k · revenue +15%
RL
ROOFERS LOCAL UNION 96
3× · 2019–2021 · $88k · revenue +14%

Funded once

RL
ROOFERS LOCAL UNION 70graduated
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +28%
RL
ROOFERS LOCAL 106graduated
one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Roofing Contractors Association

The organization represents its members in labor negotiations with the united union of roofers, waterproofers and allied workers local union 30.

—

International Union of Bricklayers &

Collective bargaining representation on behalf of members.

—

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and

Labor union

—

Plumbers and Pipefitters Local

Union purposes include negotiating fair wages, safe working conditions, job protection and education of its members. membership consists of journeymen and apprentices of the plumbing and pipefitting industry.

—

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and

Labor union

—

Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union

Process membership dues and assessments; facilitate recordkeeping; and provide services and benefits to members.

—

United Brotherhood of Carpenters &

A membership organization providing training, leadership and support for local labor union members.

—

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and

Labor union

—

Eastern Atlantic States Regional

Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.

—

Carpenters Union Local 1306

Representing members in matters of collective bargaining.

—

Sprinkler Fitters & Appr Local Union 55

Labor union

—

United Association Local 140

This exempt organization is a labor union. as a labor union it represents its members to secure better working conditions and career advancement for its members. this includes but is not limited to negotiating labor contracts, handling…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Union of Roofers Waterproofers and the most unlike its peers is Center for Military Recruitment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/9

Grantees still filing

9/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Environment$394,200Other$384,980Philanthropy$63,000Employment$29,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: KALKREUTH ROOFING CHARITIES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~14 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +95% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 823895126 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on KALKREUTH ROOFING CHARITIES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 14 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 18% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to United Union of Roofers Waterproofers?

Find your warmest path to United Union of Roofers Waterproofers through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to United Union of Roofers Waterproofers?

More from the funding graph

UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to United Union of Roofers Waterproofers?

More from the funding graph