How much did THE DAVID AND JENNIFER HARDIE MEMORIAL grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of THE DAVID AND JENNIFER HARDIE MEMORIAL’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

—

2022

—

2023

researchdisabled veteranschildrenmedical care

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200

Median grant

States reached

$580k

Total assets

Largest grants

SCRIPPS HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$800
THE SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$350
SOUTHERN NEVADA PUBLIC TELEVISION$300
ACLU$250
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA$250
CONSUMER REPORTS INC$250
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA$200
DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION$200
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC$200
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$200
CENTER FOR INQUIRY INC$155
AARP FOUNDATION$100
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$100
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE INC$100

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$12k · 7 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$12k

$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+82%

Still filing today

57%

25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CR
CONSUMER REPORTS INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +7%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL
2× · 2023–2024 · $1k · revenue +74%
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $700 · revenue +44%

Funded once

PV
PARALYZED VETERANS
one grant, 2021 · $700
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $560 · revenue +46%
SH
SHRINERS HOSPITALS
one grant, 2021 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Leader Dogs for the Blind

Empowering people who are blind or visually impaired with lifelong skills for safe and independent daily travel.

Human Services

Paralyzed Veterans of America -

We strive to improve the quality of life of honorably discharged veterans who have spinal cord injury, dysfunction or illness, including but not limited to ms and als, through programs described in sch o.

—

National Industries for the Blind

To enhance the opportunities for the economic and personal independence of people who are blind, primarily through creating, sustaining, and improving employment.

—

Paralyzed Veterans of America

The gateway chapter paralyzed veterans of america will use our unique expertise to ensure quality healthcare and provide programs that promote active lifestyles, expand opportunities, and enhance the quality of life for veterans and all…

—

The Blind Eye Project Inc

Human Services

Research to Prevent Blindness

Provides the organizational & financial resources necessary to support eye research

Health

Independence for the Blind of

Our mission is to teach independent living skills, computer and adaptive technology, and to provide vocational training, and employment-related services to people who are blind or visually impaired so they can achieve maximum independence.

Employment

The International Retinal Research

Health

American Council of the Blind Inc

The organization strives to improve the well-being of all blind and visually impaired people.

Health

Gerald C Fox Foundation

Philanthropy

Affiliated Blind of Louisianainc

To promote the general welfare of the blind by educating the public and informing the blind populace of services available to them.

—

Dogs for the Deaf Inc

Dogs for better lives (dbl) is the oldest hearing dog training center in the u.s. and among one of the first assistance dog organizations in the world to be fully accredited by assistance dogs international. dbl trainers must complete an…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warrior Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

12/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$12,236Public Benefit$2,208Human Services$1,835Health$1,450Arts & Culture$455Education$200Civil Rights$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE DAVID AND JENNIFER HARDIE MEMORIAL funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CONSUMER REPORTS INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue held over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 131776434 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CONSUMER REPORTS INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Share of budget not derivable.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The David and Jennifer Hardie Memorial?

Find your warmest path to The David and Jennifer Hardie Memorial through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE DAVID AND JENNIFER HARDIE MEMORIAL

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The David and Jennifer Hardie Memorial?

More from the funding graph

THE DAVID AND JENNIFER HARDIE MEMORIAL

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The David and Jennifer Hardie Memorial?

More from the funding graph