Loading…
· Public charity
NEW HAMPSHIRE ALLIANCE OF REGIONAL
An entity with membership of new hampshire economic development corporations sharing resources and information on a state wide basis.
$257k
Granted FY2024
9
Grants
1
Communities
$57k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Community Improvement$1.4MOther$114k
02FY2024 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $201k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$21,998
Median grant
1
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
- SOUTHEAST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$56,925
- COOS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP$39,000
- BELKNAP COUNTY ECONOMIC DEV COUNCIL$38,000
- MONADNOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP$23,320
- MT WASHINGTON VALLEY ECONOMIC$21,998
- WENTWORTH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$21,203
- COASTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP$19,000
- ROCKINGHAM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$19,000
- GRAFTON REGION DEVELOPMENT CORP$19,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 7%. 79% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
10
0
Total granted
$1.6M
$0
Still filing today
90%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SESOUTHEAST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT8× · 2017–2024 · $230k · revenue +37%
- REROCKINGHAM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT8× · 2017–2024 · $178k · revenue +18%
- CECOOS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP8× · 2017–2024 · $172k · revenue +513%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Economic Development Corporation
To promote and maintain a strong business climate throughout the city and to foster a healthy and sustainable economy for the benefit of the entire community.
—
2
Addison County Economic Development Corporation
To create an entrepreneurial and innovative environment, nurturing business to launch, grow, and thrive.
—
3
Skowhegan Economic Development Corp
To foster, encourage and assist in the location, settlement or resettlement of industry and recreational, agricultural,and other business enterprises in the Town of Skowhegan and in the County of Somerset.
Community Improvement
4
New Brunswick Development Corporation
Human Services
5
Economic Development Council of Western
Regional economic development
—
6
Northern Maine Development Commission
To serve the northern Maine region with effective regional community planning and economic development.
Community Improvement
7
Green Mountain Economic Development Corp
To foster and develop economic vitality and prosperity consistent with the goals of the communities we serve.
—
8
Scotland County Economic Development
Promoted growth of local economy by recruiting new business, increasing jobs and infrastructure investment.
Employment
9
Morris County Economic Development
Community Improvement
10
Dorchester Economic Development Corporat
Dorchester county economic development's mission is to create an environment that supports new business growth and retention enabling companies to succeed for generations. in addition, we work to strengthen and prepare our community for…
Community Improvement
11
Dorchester Bay Economic Development
Dorchester bay economic development corporation acts to build a strong, thriving, and diverse community in boston's dorchester neighborhoods. working closely with neighborhoods, residents, businesses and partners, we access resources…
Community Improvement
12
Scarborough Economic Dev Corp
The mission of sedco is to support economic and business development to improve the quality of life in scarborough, maine, by expanding the towns tax and employment base.
Community Improvement
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Strafford Economic Development and the most unlike its peers is Coastal Economic Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Community Improvement$1,436,050Other$114,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHEAST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds ROCKINGHAM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds COOS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds BELKNAP COUNTY ECONOMIC DEV COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds GRAFTON REGION DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds MT WASHINGTON VALLEY ECONOMIC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCI ↗
- Who funds WENTWORTH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds COASTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation NEW HAMPSHIRE ALLIANCE OF REGIONAL funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MT WASHINGTON VALLEY ECONOMIC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~17 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 223100889 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on MT WASHINGTON VALLEY ECONOMIC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 17 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 17% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to New Hampshire Alliance of Regional?
Find your warmest path to New Hampshire Alliance of Regional through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines