How much did NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT grant in FY2024?

NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT reported 41 grants totaling $1,949,598 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT based?

NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT is based in DC.

NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT

Foundation Dossiers

· Public charity

NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT

To improve the relationship between employers and ibew (the union) to all levels, explore ways for labor and management to work together to become more competitive, to implement programs that increase employment opportunities for employers and employees.

$1.9M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$300k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 96% of NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

business

2019

business

2020

business

2021

business

2022

every electricalelectrical workerelectrical workerscustomersliving elevateconditions memberswages

2023

memberselectrical workersmemberelectrical contractorsworkers entireentire electricalsecure adequate

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $17k
$10k–50k34 grants · $721k
$50k–250k3 grants · $448k
$250k+2 grants · $600k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$664k

Total assets

Largest grants

NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INC$300,000
IBEW$300,000
RENO TYPE$197,506
IBEW$179,832
ELECTRICAL LMCC OF DAYTON OHIO$70,700
CANTON ELECTRICAL LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE$40,000
FORT WAYNE QUALITY CONNECTION$40,000
LABOR MANAGEMENT COOP COMMITTEE INC$33,018
NSUJL$25,000
IBEW LOCAL 494$20,000
IBEW LU 379$20,000
IBEW LOCAL 553$20,000
LMCC LOCAL 354$20,000
SOUTHEASTERN LINE CONSTRUCTORS CHAPTER$20,000
BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.5M · 17 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +63% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.5M

$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%

+63%

Still filing today

100%

87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $821k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EmploymentCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentPhilanthropyScience & TechHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

IB
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS (PARENT)
8× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +14%
NE
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +59%
IL
IBEW LOCAL UNION 48
3× · 2022–2024 · $65k · revenue +94%

Funded once

US
UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE
one grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue +6%
BM
BMA MEDIA GROUP
one grant, 2022 · $64k
NC
NECA CT CHAPTERgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

International Brotherhood of Electrical

To provide the membership quality labor conditions.

—

International Brotherhood of Electrical

Labor union

—

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

To organize workers in the electrical industry, settle disputes between employers and employees by arbitration, reduce hours, secure adequate pay for work, seek a higher standard of living for members, seek security for members, by legal…

—

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

To organize workers in the electrical industry, including public utilities and manufacturing, into local unions, promote reasonable methods of work, settle disputes between employers and employees by arbitration, assist members, reduce…

—

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

To provide the members of the local electrical union with services and benefits.

—

International Brotherhood of Electrical

To organize all workers and secure improved compensation and working conditions thru collective bargaining

—

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

The international brotherhood of electrical workers local 340 is the collective bargaining agent for persons employed by union shops in the related industry. as a member supported organization, the majority of income is generated by dues…

—

International Brotherhood of

To coordinate the political and legislative effort of local unions

Employment

International Brotherhood of Electrical

Labor union

—

International Union of Operating Engineers Local Union 66

Labor union

—

International Union of Operating

The organization is a labor union, organized under an International Charter, to provide and promote benefits for its members and represent them in labor negotiations and contract issues.

—

International Brotherhood of Electrical

Enforcement of collective bargaining agreement union representation and administration

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Brotherhood of Electrical and the most unlike its peers is Ibew Local 275 West Michigan Labor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 78 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/86

the rest of the field

11%

1,356/12,915

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

80 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

80/80

Grantees still filing

76/80

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$7,034,434Environment$85,000Community Improvement$80,000Employment$68,218Human Services$50,000Philanthropy$20,000Science & Tech$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 911755378 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 65% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Neca-Ibew National Labor-Management?

Find your warmest path to Neca-Ibew National Labor-Management through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

80 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Neca-Ibew National Labor-Management?

More from the funding graph

NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

80 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Neca-Ibew National Labor-Management?

More from the funding graph