Loading…
· Public charity
MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART
The mission of the purple heart foundation is to enhance the quality of life of purple heart recipients and other honorably discharged veterans and their families.
$335k
Granted FY2024
2
Grants
2
Communities
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Public Benefit$11MHuman Services$75kOther$3.0M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
conference
2020
—
2021
—
2022
parade
2023
—
2024
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$20,377
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
- LAMOPH (LADIES MOPH)$20,377
- WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION$15,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 8%. 47% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 8 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
8
4
Total granted
$14M
$88k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
-23%
+134%
Still filing today
50%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesPublic BenefitOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOMOPH OF THE USA INC4× · 2018–2021 · $11M · revenue -91% · 90% of their budget
- MDMOPH DEPARTMENT OF PENNSYLVANIA5× · 2018–2022 · $1.9M
- MAMOPH AUXILIARY5× · 2018–2022 · $414k · revenue +6% · 78% of their budget
Funded once
- VMVETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC-graduatedone grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +134%
- MDMOPH DEPARTMENT OF TEXASone grant, 2018 · $33k
- GVGEORGIA VETERANS DAY ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +374% · 30% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Military Order of the Purple Heart
Veterans organization made up of combat wounded veterans to allow members to stay informed of new developments and opportunities.
—
2
Military Order of the Purple Heart
To foster an environment of goodwill and camaraderie among combat wounded veterns, promote patriotism, support necessary legislation initiatives and most importantly, provide service to all veterns and their families.
—
3
Military Order of the Purple Heart of the Usa Inc Dept of Pa
Support Veterans Veterans group consisting of Purple Heart recipients. Provided support and care for Veterans.
—
4
Amvets American Veterans Department
Public Benefit
5
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the 6461
Veterans affairs
—
6
Vietnam Veterans of America Alaska
Assisting veterans with services-connected disabilities and related benefits. service officers to help find benefits for veterans.
—
7
Paralyzed Veterans of America
The gateway chapter paralyzed veterans of america will use our unique expertise to ensure quality healthcare and provide programs that promote active lifestyles, expand opportunities, and enhance the quality of life for veterans and all…
—
8
Veterans of Foreign Wars
Health and welfare of the american veteran of foreign wars
—
9
Milvet
MilVet supports and honors deployed troops veterans and their families
Human Services
10
Vietnam Veterans of America #317
Our primary mission is to help vietnam era veterans and their families. our most significant activity is our service officer program which assists veterans if filing benefit claims with the department of veterans affairs.
Public Benefit
11
Paralyzed Veterans of America -
We strive to improve the quality of life of honorably discharged veterans who have spinal cord injury, dysfunction or illness, including but not limited to ms and als, through programs described in sch o.
—
12
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the Us Dept of Mt
Service officers for filing and managing va claims. to assist the posts in providing services to members and their families for veterans of foreign wars.
Public Benefit
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Military Order of Purple Heart and the most unlike its peers is American Studies Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Public Benefit$10,662,452Other$3,044,922Human Services$75,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOPH OF THE USA INC ↗
- Who funds MOPH AUXILIARY ↗
- Who funds MOPH DEPARTMENT OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds MOPH DEPARTMENT OF WISCONSIN ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN VETERANS CENTER ↗
- Who funds VETERANS MOVING FORWARD INC- ↗
- Who funds WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA VETERANS DAY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE DIRECTORS OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Warrior Canine Connection Inc — 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MOPH OF THE USA INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 3 filed years.
Track record & reputation
high risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.
Legal standing
medium risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 590829647 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on MOPH OF THE USA INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 90% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Military Order of the Purple Heart?
Find your warmest path to Military Order of the Purple Heart through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines