How much did CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC grant in FY2023?

CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC reported 23 grants totaling $16,607,705 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC based?

CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC is based in CT.

CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC

The CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC violence, inc.

$17M

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$1.6M

Largest

01What you fund

0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Human Services$59MHealth$14MHousing & Shelter$207kCrime & Legal$35kOther$12M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

homelesshomelessnesshospitalitybuildsolutionsbarriersbecome

2021

homelesshomelessnesshospitalityplaceindependencebuildsolutions

2022

collectivehomelesshomelessnesshospitalityensuresolutionsbarriers

2023

homelesshospitalityhomelessnesscirilegalbarriersbecome

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $6k
$10k–50k3 grants · $101k
$50k–250k3 grants · $270k
$250k+16 grants · $16M

$738,684

Median grant

States reached

$12M

Total assets

Largest grants

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER$1,633,368
INTERVAL HOUSE$1,521,056
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROG UNITED SVCS$1,385,310
THE UMBRELLA CENTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$1,334,087
SAFE HAVEN GRT WATERBURY$1,229,747
SAFE FUTURES$1,203,801
THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE$1,200,510
PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC$1,158,773
THE NETWORK$880,400
SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT$808,131
THE CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT AND EDUCATION$802,220
NEW HORIZONS$738,684
CHRYSALIS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SVCS$658,161
THE UMBRELLA CENTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$555,510
PROJECT SAGE$553,286

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against cost of living need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$85M · 21 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$85M

$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%

+1057%

Still filing today

95%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TU
THE UMBRELLA CENTER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
6× · 2018–2023 · $10M · revenue +23%
DV
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER
6× · 2018–2023 · $8.7M · revenue +4% · 53% of their budget
IH
INTERVAL HOUSE
6× · 2018–2023 · $7.8M · revenue +72% · 54% of their budget

Funded once

TH
THE HOUSING COLLECTIVEgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +1057%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Transition House Inc

Transition house is a human services agency dedicated to ending and preventing domestic violence.

—

Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—

Center for Hope and Safety Inc

Center for hope and safety, inc.'s ("chs") mission is to assist victims and survivors of domestic violence, including emotional, economic, sexual and physical abuse. the agency provides emergency and transitional housing, emotional…

Human Services

Domestic Violence

The Organization provides direct services to victims and their families who are impacted by violent crime. These services include access to a 24 hour crisis line, shelter for those in imminent danger, support groups, advocacy assistance…

Human Services

Crisis Center for Domestic Abuse

The crisis center is committed to the prevention and elimination of domestic violence and sexual assault. we work to enhance safety and to promote equality in relationships.

—

Crisis Center & Women's Shelter Inc

To promote a culture of non-violence and social justive through the empowerment of all those impacted by domestic violence.

Human Services

Bethany House Abuse Shelter Inc

Bethany house abuse shelter provides a safe haven and comprehensive services for victims of domestic violence and their children.

Human Services

Domestic Abuse Intervention

Domestic abuse intervention programs is a nonprofit agency that works towards the elimination of violence in the lives of women and their children.

Human Services

Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services

S a F E Shelter

Provides Crisis intervention and advocacy for Victims of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault. Provides Emergency confidential Shelter to victims of Domestic Violence.

—

Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

To develop and advocate public policies to allow for decent and affordable housing in ct.

—

The Women's Center Inc

To provide support for all impacted by domestic/child abuse, sexual violence & trafficking.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prudence Crandall Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Center for Empowerment and Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

19/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$58,803,822Health$13,824,570Other$12,476,809Housing & Shelter$207,083Crime & Legal$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Petit Family Foundation IncCT22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Petit Family Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation · American Savings Foundation Inc · Peoples United Community Foundation · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Near and Far Association Inc · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman · Farmington Bank Community · United Way Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

3rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHRYSALIS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SVCS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 060972610 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CHRYSALIS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SVCS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 78% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic?

Find your warmest path to Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic?

More from the funding graph

CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic?

More from the funding graph