British Columbia · Registered charity
SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY
SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY (British Columbia) receives grants from 11 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$120,310 to it, the largest being THE SITKA FOUNDATION (C$50,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 184 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 184 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Pacific Salmon Foundation/Fondation Du Saumon Du Pacifiquelocalportfolio match
- Nature Canada / Canada Natureshared fundersportfolio match
- Squamish Hospital Foundationlocal
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 34% · 2022 37% · 2023 33% · 2024 19%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
99% of SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (25% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose C$75 → C$24k.
From the CRA filings of SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 42% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 67% · 2022 61% · 2023 43% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
66% of SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY's grant income comes from British Columbia funders.
In-province vs out-of-province, by year
Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$38k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 11 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Pacific Salmon Foundation/Fondation Du Saumon Du Pacifiquelocalportfolio matchBC · funds 2 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Nature Canada / Canada Natureshared fundersportfolio matchON · backs 35 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Squamish Hospital FoundationlocalBC · funds 3 organizations near you
- Birds Canada / Oiseaux Canadaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Bc Parks Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Eden Conservation Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- South Peel Naturalists' Clubportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- CANADIAN PARKS AND WILDERNESS SOCIETY/La Société pour la nature et les parcs du Canadaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Gosling Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Willow Grove Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Glasswaters Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Whistler Blackcomb Foundation SocietylocalBC · funds 10 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government revenue SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY reports
Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.
- 19% of FY2024 revenue
- As filed, not traced to an award
Organizations like SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In British Columbia
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
99% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Questions and answers
- Who funds SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY?
- SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY (British Columbia) receives grants from 11 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$120,310 to it, the largest being THE SITKA FOUNDATION (C$50,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY have?
- Canada Revenue Agency filings report 11 organizations giving C$120,310 in grants to SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY?
- THE SITKA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$50,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like SQUAMISH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOCIETY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in British Columbia.
Play a game about who funds Squamish Environmental Conservation Society →
These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 11 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register