Skip to content
← Canadian charities

Northwest Territories · Registered charity

HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE

HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE (Northwest Territories) receives grants from 18 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$1,044,125 to it, the largest being TAMARACK INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT (C$245,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$3.9M
Revenue FY2024
18
Funders on record
C$1.0M
Grants received
C$1.8M
Net assets
9/18 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 23%

Against its field

HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,132 community resource nonprofits its size.

Operating margin2% · above the median
Months of reserve2.9mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,132 community resource nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$1.8M) Expenses 100 (C$1.9M) Net assets 100 (C$1.2M)2018 Revenue 79 (C$1.4M) Expenses 74 (C$1.4M) Net assets 101 (C$1.2M)2019 Revenue 80 (C$1.4M) Expenses 70 (C$1.3M) Net assets 109 (C$1.3M)2020 Revenue 67 (C$1.2M) Expenses 70 (C$1.3M) Net assets -18 (C$-215370)2021 Revenue 80 (C$1.4M) Expenses 74 (C$1.4M) Net assets 107 (C$1.3M)2022 Revenue 117 (C$2.1M) Expenses 117 (C$2.2M) Net assets 97 (C$1.2M)2023 Revenue 178 (C$3.2M) Expenses 146 (C$2.8M) Net assets 142 (C$1.7M)2024 Revenue 215 (C$3.9M) Expenses 199 (C$3.8M) Net assets 149 (C$1.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (215)Expenses (199)Net assets (149)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 89% · 2018 78% · 2019 83% · 2020 84% · 2021 68% · 2022 68% · 2023 76% · 2024 79%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

0% of HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (4% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 849 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$101k
’17
C$21k
’18
C$113k
’19
−C$122k
’20
C$49k
’21
−C$126k
’22
C$420k
’23
C$85k
’24
2.9
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose C$44k → C$224k.

From the CRA filings of HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 17 of 18 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE.

23%
largest funder
49%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 69% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 89% · 2021 52% · 2022 32% · 2023 60% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE draws 91% of its grant income from funders outside Northwest Territories, across 4 regions in all.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Northwest Territories out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 18 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$3.1M
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  • 79% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Northwest Territories

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 11%Fundraising 0%

Governance

4
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE?
HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE (Northwest Territories) receives grants from 18 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$1,044,125 to it, the largest being TAMARACK INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT (C$245,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 18 organizations giving C$1,044,125 in grants to HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE?
TAMARACK INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT is the largest funder on record, with C$245,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like HOME BASE YELLOWKNIFE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Northwest Territories.

Play a game about who funds Home Base Yellowknife →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 18 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register