Skip to content
← Canadian charities

British Columbia · Registered charity

SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL

SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL (British Columbia) receives grants from 6 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$294,538 to it, the largest being SHUSWAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (C$273,262). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 93% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

C$326k
Revenue FY2024
6
Funders on record
C$295k
Grants received
C$0
Net assets
2/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 23%

Against its field

SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL has grown faster than half of the 689 education in the arts nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−13% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve3.2mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 689 education in the arts nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$191k) Expenses 100 (C$193k) Net assets 100 (C$15k)2018 Revenue 101 (C$193k) Expenses 100 (C$192k) Net assets 105 (C$16k)2019 Revenue 103 (C$197k) Expenses 102 (C$197k) Net assets 108 (C$16k)2020 Revenue 89 (C$170k) Expenses 86 (C$166k) Net assets 111 (C$17k)2021 Revenue 146 (C$278k) Expenses 131 (C$252k) Net assets 283 (C$43k)2022 Revenue 139 (C$266k) Expenses 127 (C$246k) Net assets 393 (C$59k)2023 Revenue 168 (C$320k) Expenses 163 (C$315k) Net assets 425 (C$64k)2024 Revenue 171 (C$326k) Expenses 190 (C$367k) Net assets 0 (C$0)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (171)Expenses (190)Net assets (0)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 46% · 2018 56% · 2019 58% · 2020 61% · 2021 43% · 2022 49% · 2023 54% · 2024 55%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

42% of SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (11% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 660 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$2k
’17
C$705
’18
C$557
’19
C$4k
’20
C$26k
’21
C$20k
’22
C$5k
’23
−C$41k
’24
3.2
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose C$34k → C$39k.

From the CRA filings of SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 93% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL.

93%
largest funder
98%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 99% · 2018 84% · 2019 96% · 2020 96% · 2021 100% · 2022 84% · 2023 95% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

93% of SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the C$21k that is directly attributable, 66% of it comes from British Columbia funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
British Columbia out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$273k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$179k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  • 55% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In British Columbia

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

67% of spending goes to programs.

Program 67%Management 33%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL?
SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL (British Columbia) receives grants from 6 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$294,538 to it, the largest being SHUSWAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (C$273,262). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 93% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 6 organizations giving C$294,538 in grants to SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL?
SHUSWAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$273,262 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SHUSWAP DISTRICT ARTS COUNCIL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in British Columbia.

Play a game about who funds Shuswap District Arts Council →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register