Skip to content
← Canadian charitiesAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Alberta · Registered charity

Oldman WaterShed Council

Oldman WaterShed Council (Alberta) receives grants from 13 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$795,658 to it, the largest being SAMUEL HANEN SOCIETY FOR RESOURCE CONSERVATION (C$220,000). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$945k
Revenue FY2024
13
Funders on record
C$796k
Grants received
C$772k
Net assets
11/13 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 22%

Against its field

Oldman WaterShed Council holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,990 public amenities nonprofits its size.

Operating margin14% · above the median
Months of reserve17.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,990 public amenities nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$917k) Expenses 100 (C$937k) Net assets 100 (C$233k)2018 Revenue 99 (C$903k) Expenses 105 (C$982k) Net assets 66 (C$155k)2019 Revenue 83 (C$757k) Expenses 71 (C$663k) Net assets 108 (C$251k)2020 Revenue 73 (C$672k) Expenses 56 (C$526k) Net assets 163 (C$380k)2021 Revenue 64 (C$590k) Expenses 54 (C$509k) Net assets 198 (C$461k)2022 Revenue 112 (C$1.0M) Expenses 99 (C$932k) Net assets 240 (C$560k)2023 Revenue 93 (C$848k) Expenses 82 (C$770k) Net assets 273 (C$638k)2024 Revenue 103 (C$945k) Expenses 87 (C$811k) Net assets 331 (C$772k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (103)Expenses (87)Net assets (331)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 45% · 2018 45% · 2019 54% · 2020 66% · 2021 70% · 2022 70% · 2023 46% · 2024 57%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

6% of Oldman WaterShed Council’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (10% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,845 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$20k
’17
−C$79k
’18
C$94k
’19
C$146k
’20
C$81k
’21
C$98k
’22
C$78k
’23
C$134k
’24
18
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 8 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose C$93k → C$95k.

From the CRA filings of Oldman WaterShed Council’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Oldman WaterShed Council has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 28% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Oldman WaterShed Council.

28%
largest funder
62%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 27% · 2018 33% · 2019 43% · 2020 44% · 2021 34% · 2022 40% · 2023 26% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of Oldman WaterShed Council's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 85% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

81% of Oldman WaterShed Council's grant income comes from Alberta funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Alberta out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$71k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 13 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue Oldman WaterShed Council reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$540k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  • 57% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like Oldman WaterShed Council

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alberta

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 20%Fundraising 0%

Questions and answers

Who funds Oldman WaterShed Council?
Oldman WaterShed Council (Alberta) receives grants from 13 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$795,658 to it, the largest being SAMUEL HANEN SOCIETY FOR RESOURCE CONSERVATION (C$220,000). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Oldman WaterShed Council have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 13 organizations giving C$795,658 in grants to Oldman WaterShed Council, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Oldman WaterShed Council?
SAMUEL HANEN SOCIETY FOR RESOURCE CONSERVATION is the largest funder on record, with C$220,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Oldman WaterShed Council find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alberta.

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 13 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register