British Columbia · Registered charity
MAMAS FOR MAMAS
MAMAS FOR MAMAS (British Columbia) receives grants from 105 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$4,112,718 to it, the largest being CANADAHELPS CANADON (C$1,809,525). 37 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
MAMAS FOR MAMAS has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,748 organizations relieving poverty nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,748 organizations relieving poverty nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Rotary Club of Kelowna Foundationlocal
- Troop Impact Foundationportfolio match
- Grey Birch Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2019 4% · 2020 12% · 2021 5% · 2022 4% · 2023 1% · 2024 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
100% of MAMAS FOR MAMAS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (8% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 48 funders, grant income rose C$37k → C$665k.
From the CRA filings of MAMAS FOR MAMAS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 105 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
MAMAS FOR MAMAS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 44% of grant income and the top three 52%; half comes from just 3 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MAMAS FOR MAMAS.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 54% · 2018 33% · 2019 27% · 2020 20% · 2021 17% · 2022 21% · 2023 15% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
42% of MAMAS FOR MAMAS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 35% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
MAMAS FOR MAMAS draws 68% of its grant income from funders outside British Columbia, across 6 regions in all.
In-province vs out-of-province, by year
Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$294k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 regions is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 105 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Rotary Club of Kelowna FoundationlocalBC · funds 23 organizations near you
- Troop Impact Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Grey Birch Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Neil Murkar Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Youth and Philanthropy Initiative Canada/ Initiative Canada Jeunesse Et Philanthropieportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Felix Y. Manalo Foundation Inc.portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The May Court Club of Londonportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- School Sisters of Notre Dame of Ontarioportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Colin & Lois Pritchard FoundationlocalBC · funds 19 organizations near you
- Courage FoundationlocalBC · funds 13 organizations near you
- Kls FoundationlocalBC · funds 8 organizations near you
- The Henry and Gertrude Sawatzky Family Foundation Inc.localBC · funds 8 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government revenue MAMAS FOR MAMAS reports
Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.
- 3% of FY2024 revenue
- As filed, not traced to an award
Organizations like MAMAS FOR MAMAS
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In British Columbia
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
73% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Questions and answers
- Who funds MAMAS FOR MAMAS?
- MAMAS FOR MAMAS (British Columbia) receives grants from 105 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$4,112,718 to it, the largest being CANADAHELPS CANADON (C$1,809,525). 37 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does MAMAS FOR MAMAS have?
- Canada Revenue Agency filings report 105 organizations giving C$4,112,718 in grants to MAMAS FOR MAMAS, 37 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of MAMAS FOR MAMAS?
- CANADAHELPS CANADON is the largest funder on record, with C$1,809,525 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like MAMAS FOR MAMAS find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in British Columbia.
Play a game about who funds Mamas for Mamas →
These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 105 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register