Skip to content
← Canadian charities

British Columbia · Registered charity

LUKE 15 HOUSE

LUKE 15 HOUSE (British Columbia) receives grants from 20 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$343,417 to it, the largest being ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF VANCOUVER (C$91,140). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$639k
Revenue FY2024
20
Funders on record
C$343k
Grants received
C$444k
Net assets
12/20 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 19%

Against its field

LUKE 15 HOUSE has grown faster than half of the 1,262 support of religion nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−19% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.0mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,262 support of religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$447k) Expenses 100 (C$381k) Net assets 0 (C$0)2018 Revenue 129 (C$576k) Expenses 150 (C$573k) Net assets 0 (C$0)2019 Revenue 81 (C$361k) Expenses 92 (C$350k) Net assets 100 (C$413k)2020 Revenue 110 (C$492k) Expenses 117 (C$447k) Net assets 113 (C$468k)2021 Revenue 99 (C$444k) Expenses 104 (C$396k) Net assets 125 (C$516k)2022 Revenue 89 (C$397k) Expenses 103 (C$391k) Net assets 0 (C$0)2023 Revenue 117 (C$524k) Expenses 120 (C$459k) Net assets 200 (C$827k)2024 Revenue 143 (C$639k) Expenses 199 (C$759k) Net assets 107 (C$444k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (143)Expenses (199)Net assets (107)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 59% · 2018 46% · 2019 65% · 2020 28% · 2021 14% · 2022 72% · 2023 11% · 2024 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

29% of LUKE 15 HOUSE’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,239 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

C$66k
’17
C$3k
’18
C$11k
’19
C$45k
’20
C$48k
’21
C$6k
’22
C$65k
’23
−C$120k
’24
4.0
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 8 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose C$30k → C$42k.

From the CRA filings of LUKE 15 HOUSE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LUKE 15 HOUSE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund LUKE 15 HOUSE.

27%
largest funder
66%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 72% · 2018 38% · 2019 60% · 2020 42% · 2021 57% · 2022 43% · 2023 36% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

56% of LUKE 15 HOUSE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 60% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

71% of LUKE 15 HOUSE's grant income comes from British Columbia funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
British Columbia out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$1k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 20 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue LUKE 15 HOUSE reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$60k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  • 9% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like LUKE 15 HOUSE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In British Columbia

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

60% of spending goes to programs.

Program 60%Management 37%Fundraising 2%

Governance

6
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds LUKE 15 HOUSE?
LUKE 15 HOUSE (British Columbia) receives grants from 20 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$343,417 to it, the largest being ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF VANCOUVER (C$91,140). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LUKE 15 HOUSE have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 20 organizations giving C$343,417 in grants to LUKE 15 HOUSE, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LUKE 15 HOUSE?
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF VANCOUVER is the largest funder on record, with C$91,140 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LUKE 15 HOUSE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in British Columbia.

Play a game about who funds Luke 15 House →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 20 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register