Skip to content
← Canadian charities

Ontario · Registered charity

KIDS IN CAMP

KIDS IN CAMP (Ontario) receives grants from 28 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$460,971 to it, the largest being CANADAHELPS CANADON (C$346,651). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$199k
Revenue FY2024
28
Funders on record
C$461k
Grants received
C$412k
Net assets
11/28 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 66%

Against its field

KIDS IN CAMP is better cushioned than half of the 4,360 organizations relieving poverty nonprofits its size.

Operating margin3% · below the median
Months of reserve9.0mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,360 organizations relieving poverty nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$192k) Expenses 100 (C$232k) Net assets 100 (C$185k)2018 Revenue 75 (C$144k) Expenses 75 (C$173k) Net assets 84 (C$156k)2019 Revenue 90 (C$172k) Expenses 65 (C$151k) Net assets 95 (C$175k)2020 Revenue 43 (C$83k) Expenses 17 (C$39k) Net assets 118 (C$219k)2021 Revenue 77 (C$147k) Expenses 20 (C$46k) Net assets 156 (C$290k)2022 Revenue 95 (C$183k) Expenses 54 (C$126k) Net assets 187 (C$347k)2023 Revenue 115 (C$221k) Expenses 69 (C$161k) Net assets 219 (C$407k)2024 Revenue 103 (C$199k) Expenses 84 (C$194k) Net assets 222 (C$412k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (103)Expenses (84)Net assets (222)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

95% of KIDS IN CAMP’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,863 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$39k
’17
−C$30k
’18
C$22k
’19
C$44k
’20
C$101k
’21
C$57k
’22
C$60k
’23
C$5k
’24
9.0
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 9 funders, grant income rose C$12k → C$82k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
C$347k
C$45k
C$10k
C$3k
Laidlaw Foundationunclassified
C$2k
Toronto Foundationunclassified
C$2k
C$180
C$100
funders
9
4
8
8
11
6
9
5

From the CRA filings of KIDS IN CAMP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KIDS IN CAMP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 75% of grant income and the top three 88%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund KIDS IN CAMP.

75%
largest funder
88%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 74% · 2018 91% · 2019 76% · 2020 67% · 2021 68% · 2022 82% · 2023 68% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of KIDS IN CAMP's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 39% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

89% of KIDS IN CAMP's grant income comes from Ontario funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Ontario out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$1k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 28 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like KIDS IN CAMP

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ontario

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

1% of spending goes to programs.

Program 1%Management 99%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds KIDS IN CAMP?
KIDS IN CAMP (Ontario) receives grants from 28 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$460,971 to it, the largest being CANADAHELPS CANADON (C$346,651). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does KIDS IN CAMP have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 28 organizations giving C$460,971 in grants to KIDS IN CAMP, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of KIDS IN CAMP?
CANADAHELPS CANADON is the largest funder on record, with C$346,651 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KIDS IN CAMP find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ontario.

Play a game about who funds Kids in Camp →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 28 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register