Skip to content
← Canadian charitiesAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Ontario · Registered charity

JUMP MATH

JUMP MATH (Ontario) receives grants from 49 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$4,531,837 to it, the largest being SUNCOR ENERGY FOUNDATION/FONDATION SUNCOR ENERGIE (C$633,142). 29 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$7.9M
Revenue FY2024
49
Funders on record
C$4.5M
Grants received
C$2.3M
Net assets
29/49 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%

Against its field

JUMP MATH runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 388 support of schools and education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin8% · above the median
Months of reserve1.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 388 support of schools and education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$3.9M) Expenses 100 (C$4.3M) Net assets 100 (C$1.1M)2018 Revenue 125 (C$4.9M) Expenses 116 (C$5.0M) Net assets 96 (C$1.1M)2019 Revenue 118 (C$4.6M) Expenses 112 (C$4.8M) Net assets 80 (C$882k)2020 Revenue 129 (C$5.1M) Expenses 118 (C$5.1M) Net assets 77 (C$853k)2021 Revenue 137 (C$5.4M) Expenses 110 (C$4.7M) Net assets 139 (C$1.5M)2022 Revenue 150 (C$5.9M) Expenses 139 (C$6.0M) Net assets 132 (C$1.5M)2023 Revenue 207 (C$8.1M) Expenses 182 (C$7.8M) Net assets 158 (C$1.7M)2024 Revenue 200 (C$7.9M) Expenses 169 (C$7.3M) Net assets 212 (C$2.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (200)Expenses (169)Net assets (212)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 11% · 2022 11% · 2023 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

24% of JUMP MATH’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (34% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 355 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$376k
’17
−C$48k
’18
−C$177k
’19
−C$28k
’20
C$682k
’21
−C$72k
’22
C$287k
’23
C$592k
’24
1.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 17 funders to 26 funders, grant income fell C$649k → C$558k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
M.E.H. Foundationunclassified
C$600k
C$255k
C$185k
C$110k
C$100k
Laidlaw Foundationunclassified
C$85k
C$60k
Toronto Foundationunclassified
C$60k
C$52k
C$26k
C$13k
funders
17
18
20
20
19
24
26
23

From the CRA filings of JUMP MATH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 49 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

JUMP MATH has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 14% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund JUMP MATH.

14%
largest funder
37%
top three
~14
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 50% · 2018 43% · 2019 21% · 2020 20% · 2021 23% · 2022 17% · 2023 15% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

45% of JUMP MATH's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 59% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

67% of JUMP MATH's grant income comes from Ontario funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Ontario out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$812k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 49 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue JUMP MATH reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2023C$10k
21
22
23
  • 0% of FY2023 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like JUMP MATH

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ontario

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

67% of spending goes to programs.

Program 67%Management 28%Fundraising 6%

Governance

14
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds JUMP MATH?
JUMP MATH (Ontario) receives grants from 49 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$4,531,837 to it, the largest being SUNCOR ENERGY FOUNDATION/FONDATION SUNCOR ENERGIE (C$633,142). 29 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does JUMP MATH have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 49 organizations giving C$4,531,837 in grants to JUMP MATH, 29 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of JUMP MATH?
SUNCOR ENERGY FOUNDATION/FONDATION SUNCOR ENERGIE is the largest funder on record, with C$633,142 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like JUMP MATH find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ontario.

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 49 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register