Skip to content
← Canadian charitiesAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Alberta · Registered charity

FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN

FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN (Alberta) receives grants from 4 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$151,724 to it, the largest being THE EDMONTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PRIV ACT (C$145,328). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 96% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

C$81k
Revenue FY2024
4
Funders on record
C$152k
Grants received
C$175k
Net assets
4/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 58%

Against its field

FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN's revenue fell 31% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin93% · outside the comparable range
Revenue growth (annualized)−5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,910 support of schools and education nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$117k) Expenses 100 (C$69k) Net assets 100 (C$151k)2018 Revenue 29 (C$34k) Expenses 45 (C$32k) Net assets 101 (C$153k)2019 Revenue 91 (C$107k) Expenses 176 (C$122k) Net assets 88 (C$133k)2020 Revenue 31 (C$36k) Expenses 141 (C$98k) Net assets -41 (C$-61908)2021 Revenue 232 (C$271k) Expenses 14 (C$10k) Net assets 28 (C$43k)2022 Revenue 44 (C$51k) Expenses 23 (C$16k) Net assets 52 (C$79k)2023 Revenue 82 (C$96k) Expenses 183 (C$127k) Net assets 32 (C$48k)2024 Revenue 69 (C$81k) Expenses 8 (C$5k) Net assets 115 (C$175k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (69)Expenses (8)Net assets (115)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 65% · 2019 72% · 2021 92%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

0% of FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,807 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

C$47k
’17
C$2k
’18
−C$16k
’19
−C$62k
’20
C$261k
’21
C$35k
’22
−C$31k
’23
C$75k
’24
61
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 2 funders, grant income rose C$19k → C$23k.

From the CRA filings of FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 96% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN.

96%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 98% · 2018 100% · 2019 99% · 2020 98% · 2021 94% · 2022 96% · 2023 87% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

96% of FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the C$6k that is directly attributable, 89% of it comes from funders outside Alberta, across 2 regions.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Alberta out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$145k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2021C$250k
17
19
21
  • 92% of FY2021 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alberta

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

0% of spending goes to programs.

Program 0%Management 100%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN?
FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN (Alberta) receives grants from 4 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$151,724 to it, the largest being THE EDMONTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PRIV ACT (C$145,328). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 96% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 4 organizations giving C$151,724 in grants to FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN?
THE EDMONTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PRIV ACT is the largest funder on record, with C$145,328 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA BOTANIC GARDEN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alberta.

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register