Skip to content
← Canadian charitiesAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

British Columbia · Registered charity

FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION

FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION (British Columbia) receives grants from 3 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$435,613 to it, the largest being ALBERNI-CLAYOQUOT CONTINUING CARE SOCIETY (C$421,796). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$36k
Revenue FY2024
3
Funders on record
C$436k
Grants received
C$19k
Net assets
2/3 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 3,067 foundations nonprofits its size.

Operating margin0% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,067 foundations nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$48k) Expenses 100 (C$92k) Net assets 100 (C$161k)2018 Revenue 48 (C$23k) Expenses 74 (C$68k) Net assets 72 (C$116k)2019 Revenue 277 (C$132k) Expenses 210 (C$194k) Net assets 34 (C$54k)2020 Revenue 91 (C$43k) Expenses 176 (C$162k) Net assets -40 (C$-64456)2021 Revenue 36 (C$17k) Expenses 11 (C$10k) Net assets -36 (C$-57421)2022 Revenue 12 (C$6k) Expenses 9 (C$8k) Net assets -37 (C$-59969)2023 Revenue 191 (C$91k) Expenses 14 (C$12k) Net assets 12 (C$19k)2024 Revenue 76 (C$36k) Expenses 39 (C$36k) Net assets 12 (C$19k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (76)Expenses (39)Net assets (12)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

5% of FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,538 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$44k
’17
−C$45k
’18
−C$62k
’19
−C$119k
’20
C$7k
’21
−C$3k
’22
C$79k
’23
C$0
’24
104
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell C$43k → C$408.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
C$14k
funders
2
2
3
2
2
2
1
2

From the CRA filings of FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 97% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION.

97%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 99% · 2018 99% · 2019 98% · 2020 99% · 2021 81% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

97% of FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION's grant income comes from British Columbia funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
British Columbia out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In British Columbia

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION?
FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION (British Columbia) receives grants from 3 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$435,613 to it, the largest being ALBERNI-CLAYOQUOT CONTINUING CARE SOCIETY (C$421,796). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 3 organizations giving C$435,613 in grants to FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION?
ALBERNI-CLAYOQUOT CONTINUING CARE SOCIETY is the largest funder on record, with C$421,796 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FIR PARK VILLAGE/ECHO VILLAGE FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in British Columbia.

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register