Skip to content
← Canadian charitiesAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Alberta · Registered charity

PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY

PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY (Alberta) receives grants from 3 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$64,124 to it, the largest being WESTLOCK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (C$64,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

C$134k
Revenue FY2024
3
Funders on record
C$64k
Grants received
C$61k
Net assets
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 65%

Against its field

PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,990 public amenities nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Months of reserve13.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,990 public amenities nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$53k) Expenses 100 (C$89k) Net assets 100 (C$92k)2018 Revenue 154 (C$82k) Expenses 90 (C$80k) Net assets 104 (C$95k)2019 Revenue 159 (C$84k) Expenses 109 (C$98k) Net assets 89 (C$82k)2020 Revenue 117 (C$62k) Expenses 74 (C$66k) Net assets 86 (C$78k)2021 Revenue 104 (C$55k) Expenses 51 (C$45k) Net assets 87 (C$80k)2022 Revenue 99 (C$52k) Expenses 60 (C$53k) Net assets 71 (C$65k)2023 Revenue 116 (C$61k) Expenses 73 (C$65k) Net assets 67 (C$61k)2024 Revenue 253 (C$134k) Expenses 151 (C$135k) Net assets 66 (C$61k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (253)Expenses (151)Net assets (66)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 26% · 2018 51% · 2019 40% · 2020 57% · 2021 53% · 2022 50% · 2023 48% · 2024 72%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

15% of PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (10% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,845 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$36k
’17
C$2k
’18
−C$13k
’19
−C$4k
’20
C$10k
’21
−C$752
’22
−C$4k
’23
−C$677
’24
14
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose C$100 → C$40k.

From the CRA filings of PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 100% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY.

100%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the C$124 that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Alberta funders.

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$64k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$96k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  • 72% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alberta

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

41% of spending goes to programs.

Program 41%Management 55%Fundraising 5%

Governance

9
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY?
PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY (Alberta) receives grants from 3 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$64,124 to it, the largest being WESTLOCK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (C$64,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 3 organizations giving C$64,124 in grants to PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY?
WESTLOCK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$64,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROGRESSIVE AND CO-ORDINATING ORGANIZATION AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alberta.

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register