British Columbia · Registered charity
DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION
DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION (British Columbia) receives grants from 8 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$569,962 to it, the largest being THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA/LA SOCIETE CANADIENNE POUR LA CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE (C$460,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,990 public amenities nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,990 public amenities nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Clayoquot Biosphere Trust Societylocal
- Ontario Land Trust Alliance Inc.portfolio match
- Nature Canada / Canada Natureportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 19% · 2018 16% · 2019 17% · 2020 42% · 2021 4% · 2022 79% · 2023 9% · 2024 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
60% of DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (10% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 6 funders, grant income rose C$190 → C$21k.
From the CRA filings of DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 81% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 61% · 2021 55% · 2022 96% · 2023 70% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
75% of DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION draws 91% of its grant income from funders outside British Columbia, across 3 regions in all.
In-province vs out-of-province, by year
Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$8k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Clayoquot Biosphere Trust SocietylocalBC · funds 22 organizations near you
- Ontario Land Trust Alliance Inc.portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Nature Canada / Canada Natureportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Gosling Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Sitka Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Birds Canada / Oiseaux Canadaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Glasswaters Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Eden Conservation Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Pacific Salmon Foundation/Fondation Du Saumon Du Pacifiqueportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Willow Beach Field Naturalists Clubportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Trans Canada trail / Sentier transcanadienportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government revenue DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION reports
Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.
- 3% of FY2024 revenue
- As filed, not traced to an award
Organizations like DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In British Columbia
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
70% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Questions and answers
- Who funds DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION?
- DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION (British Columbia) receives grants from 8 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$569,962 to it, the largest being THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA/LA SOCIETE CANADIENNE POUR LA CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE (C$460,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION have?
- Canada Revenue Agency filings report 8 organizations giving C$569,962 in grants to DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION?
- THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF CANADA/LA SOCIETE CANADIENNE POUR LA CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE is the largest funder on record, with C$460,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like DENMAN CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in British Columbia.
Play a game about who funds Denman Conservancy Association →
These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register