Skip to content
← Canadian charities

British Columbia · Registered charity

CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY

CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY (British Columbia) receives grants from 48 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$2,629,523 to it, the largest being CANADAHELPS CANADON (C$1,282,024). 34 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$1.1M
Revenue FY2024
48
Funders on record
C$2.6M
Grants received
C$2.7M
Net assets
34/48 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 34%

Against its field

CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY is better cushioned than half of the 121 animal welfare nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−30% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 121 animal welfare nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$1.1M) Expenses 100 (C$880k) Net assets 100 (C$946k)2018 Revenue 67 (C$742k) Expenses 93 (C$822k) Net assets 92 (C$866k)2019 Revenue 103 (C$1.1M) Expenses 108 (C$949k) Net assets 111 (C$1.1M)2020 Revenue 101 (C$1.1M) Expenses 114 (C$999k) Net assets 123 (C$1.2M)2021 Revenue 190 (C$2.1M) Expenses 109 (C$959k) Net assets 243 (C$2.3M)2022 Revenue 176 (C$1.9M) Expenses 143 (C$1.3M) Net assets 314 (C$3.0M)2023 Revenue 125 (C$1.4M) Expenses 151 (C$1.3M) Net assets 319 (C$3.0M)2024 Revenue 96 (C$1.1M) Expenses 155 (C$1.4M) Net assets 286 (C$2.7M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (96)Expenses (155)Net assets (286)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 3% · 2018 6% · 2019 4% · 2020 4% · 2021 3% · 2022 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

77% of CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (50% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 121 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

C$221k
’17
−C$80k
’18
C$184k
’19
C$113k
’20
C$1.1M
’21
C$677k
’22
C$48k
’23
−C$311k
’24
5.8
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 21 funders to 22 funders, grant income rose C$88k → C$352k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
C$1.3M
C$260k
C$120k
C$79k
C$45k
Loyalty Foundationunclassified
C$25k
Canada Givesunclassified
C$21k
C$17k
C$15k
C$10k
C$5k
funders
21
19
23
23
29
25
22
19

From the CRA filings of CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 48 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 69%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY.

49%
largest funder
69%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 34% · 2018 31% · 2019 20% · 2020 44% · 2021 53% · 2022 48% · 2023 53% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

56% of CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 71% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY draws 64% of its grant income from funders outside British Columbia, across 3 regions in all.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
British Columbia out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$133k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 regions is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 48 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2022C$750
17
18
19
20
21
22
  • 0% of FY2022 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In British Columbia

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

87% of spending goes to programs.

Program 87%Management 6%Fundraising 7%

Governance

5
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY?
CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY (British Columbia) receives grants from 48 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$2,629,523 to it, the largest being CANADAHELPS CANADON (C$1,282,024). 34 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 48 organizations giving C$2,629,523 in grants to CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY, 34 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY?
CANADAHELPS CANADON is the largest funder on record, with C$1,282,024 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CRITTER CARE WILDLIFE SOCIETY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in British Columbia.

Play a game about who funds Critter Care Wildlife Society →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 48 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register