Skip to content
← Canadian charities

British Columbia · Registered charity

CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK

CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK (British Columbia) receives grants from 34 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$3,852,228 to it, the largest being ZLC FOUNDATION (C$824,457). 26 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$2.7M
Revenue FY2024
34
Funders on record
C$3.9M
Grants received
C$3.3M
Net assets
26/34 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 25%

Against its field

CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK's funding base is broadening — from 17 funders to 20 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−0% · below the median
Months of reserve0.7mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 104 judaism nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$2.1M) Expenses 100 (C$2.0M) Net assets 100 (C$1.9M)2018 Revenue 98 (C$2.1M) Expenses 102 (C$2.0M) Net assets 109 (C$2.1M)2019 Revenue 113 (C$2.4M) Expenses 100 (C$2.0M) Net assets 126 (C$2.4M)2020 Revenue 102 (C$2.2M) Expenses 97 (C$1.9M) Net assets 137 (C$2.7M)2021 Revenue 110 (C$2.3M) Expenses 101 (C$2.0M) Net assets 154 (C$3.0M)2022 Revenue 99 (C$2.1M) Expenses 112 (C$2.2M) Net assets 153 (C$3.0M)2023 Revenue 117 (C$2.5M) Expenses 124 (C$2.5M) Net assets 165 (C$3.2M)2024 Revenue 130 (C$2.7M) Expenses 138 (C$2.8M) Net assets 167 (C$3.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (130)Expenses (138)Net assets (167)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 3% · 2018 3% · 2019 3% · 2020 9% · 2021 2% · 2022 5% · 2023 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

81% of CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (78% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 104 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

C$114k
’17
C$33k
’18
C$387k
’19
C$205k
’20
C$312k
’21
−C$143k
’22
−C$19k
’23
−C$9k
’24
0.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 17 funders to 20 funders, grant income rose C$454k → C$623k.

From the CRA filings of CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 34 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 21% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK.

21%
largest funder
43%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 24% · 2018 27% · 2019 38% · 2020 18% · 2021 25% · 2022 21% · 2023 23% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

84% of CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 76% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

97% of CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK's grant income comes from British Columbia funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
British Columbia out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$389k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 regions is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 34 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2023C$17k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
  • 1% of FY2023 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In British Columbia

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 5%Fundraising 4%

Governance

16
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK?
CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK (British Columbia) receives grants from 34 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$3,852,228 to it, the largest being ZLC FOUNDATION (C$824,457). 26 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 34 organizations giving C$3,852,228 in grants to CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK, 26 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK?
ZLC FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$824,457 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CONGREGATION SCHARA TZEDECK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in British Columbia.

Play a game about who funds Congregation Schara Tzedeck →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 34 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register