Ontario · Registered charity
CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE
CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE (Ontario) receives grants from 10 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$155,106 to it, the largest being MCGEACHY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION (C$100,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,986 community resource nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,986 community resource nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2019
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Howard J. Rees Foundationlocalportfolio match
- Mount Zion Presbyterian Churchlocalportfolio match
- The Gathering Place Community Churchlocalportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 2% · 2018 2% · 2019 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
100% of CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (11% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 5 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell C$102k → C$315.
From the CRA filings of CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 64% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 98% · 2018 94% · 2019 41% · 2020 50% · 2021 79% · 2022 75% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
30% of CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 70% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
90% of CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE's grant income comes from Ontario funders.
In-province vs out-of-province, by year
Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$35k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 10 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- The Howard J. Rees Foundationlocalportfolio matchON · funds 8 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Mount Zion Presbyterian Churchlocalportfolio matchON · funds 8 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- The Gathering Place Community Churchlocalportfolio matchON · funds 3 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Howard Mutual FoundationlocalON · funds 7 organizations near you
- Rotary Club of Chatham Sunrise Service Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- St Andrew's United Churchportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Rotary Club of Chatham Service Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Toronto Star Children's Charitiesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Calvin Christian School Society Wallaceburgportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kiwanis Club of Brantford Charitable Corporationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- New Brunswick Protestant Orphans Homeportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Living Stone Baptist ChurchlocalON · funds 6 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government revenue CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE reports
Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.
- 3% of FY2019 revenue
- As filed, not traced to an award
Organizations like CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Ontario
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
22% of spending goes to programs.
Questions and answers
- Who funds CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE?
- CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE (Ontario) receives grants from 10 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$155,106 to it, the largest being MCGEACHY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION (C$100,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE have?
- Canada Revenue Agency filings report 10 organizations giving C$155,106 in grants to CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE?
- MCGEACHY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$100,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CHATHAM-KENT CHILDREN'S SAFETY VILLAGE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ontario.
Play a game about who funds Chatham-Kent Children's Safety Village →
These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2019 (financials across 2017–2019), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register