Skip to content
← Canadian charities

Ontario · Registered charity

CAMP GITCHIGOMEE

CAMP GITCHIGOMEE (Ontario) receives grants from 12 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$40,711 to it, the largest being HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL (C$10,100). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$78k
Revenue FY2024
12
Funders on record
C$41k
Grants received
C$53k
Net assets
9/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 31%

Against its field

CAMP GITCHIGOMEE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 3,180 public amenities nonprofits its size.

Operating margin17% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,180 public amenities nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$43k) Expenses 100 (C$50k) Net assets 100 (C$32k)2018 Revenue 155 (C$66k) Expenses 115 (C$58k) Net assets 128 (C$40k)2019 Revenue 128 (C$55k) Expenses 105 (C$53k) Net assets 129 (C$41k)2020 Revenue 64 (C$27k) Expenses 50 (C$25k) Net assets 136 (C$43k)2021 Revenue 54 (C$23k) Expenses 48 (C$24k) Net assets 133 (C$42k)2022 Revenue 61 (C$26k) Expenses 54 (C$27k) Net assets 129 (C$41k)2023 Revenue 126 (C$54k) Expenses 102 (C$51k) Net assets 139 (C$44k)2024 Revenue 181 (C$78k) Expenses 129 (C$65k) Net assets 169 (C$53k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (181)Expenses (129)Net assets (169)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

39% of CAMP GITCHIGOMEE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (28% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,860 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−C$7k
’17
C$9k
’18
C$2k
’19
C$2k
’20
−C$851
’21
−C$1k
’22
C$3k
’23
C$13k
’24
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 4 funders, grant income rose C$3k → C$5k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
C$10k
C$2k
C$884
C$350
C$300
St Mark's Churchunclassified
C$60
funders
4
5
4
4
6
4
4
5

From the CRA filings of CAMP GITCHIGOMEE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CAMP GITCHIGOMEE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CAMP GITCHIGOMEE.

25%
largest funder
62%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 37% · 2018 38% · 2019 68% · 2020 38% · 2021 69% · 2022 46% · 2023 88% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

44% of CAMP GITCHIGOMEE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 75% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

51% of CAMP GITCHIGOMEE's grant income comes from Ontario funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Ontario out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$10k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 12 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CAMP GITCHIGOMEE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ontario

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Governance

10
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds CAMP GITCHIGOMEE?
CAMP GITCHIGOMEE (Ontario) receives grants from 12 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$40,711 to it, the largest being HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL (C$10,100). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CAMP GITCHIGOMEE have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 12 organizations giving C$40,711 in grants to CAMP GITCHIGOMEE, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CAMP GITCHIGOMEE?
HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL is the largest funder on record, with C$10,100 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CAMP GITCHIGOMEE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ontario.

Play a game about who funds Camp Gitchigomee →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register