British Columbia · Registered charity
TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY
TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY (British Columbia) receives grants from 30 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$1,240,910 to it, the largest being BRITISH COLUMBIA REHABILITATION FOUNDATION (C$264,500). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 879 core health care nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 879 core health care nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Al Roadburg Foundationshared fundersportfolio match
- Sherbrooke Mennonite Churchlocal
- British Columbia/Yukon Command of the Royal Canadian Legion Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 97% · 2018 95% · 2019 97% · 2020 95% · 2021 92% · 2022 79% · 2023 89% · 2024 87%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
7% of TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (6% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 15 funders, grant income rose C$49k → C$430k.
From the CRA filings of TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 21% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 52% · 2018 61% · 2019 67% · 2020 32% · 2021 45% · 2022 35% · 2023 58% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
86% of TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 47% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
88% of TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY's grant income comes from British Columbia funders.
In-province vs out-of-province, by year
Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$18k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 regions is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 30 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Al Roadburg Foundationshared fundersportfolio matchBC · backs 65 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Sherbrooke Mennonite ChurchlocalBC · funds 3 organizations near you
- British Columbia/Yukon Command of the Royal Canadian Legion Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- McAdams Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Allen & Loreen Van de Kerk Hove Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ocean Park Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Conconi Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Wcb Helping Handsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kelowna Professional Firefighters Charitable Societyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Peace Mennonite ChurchlocalBC · funds 3 organizations near you
- Mennonite Church British ColumbialocalBC · funds 3 organizations near you
- Peace Church on 52ndlocalBC · funds 2 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government revenue TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY reports
Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.
- 87% of FY2024 revenue
- As filed, not traced to an award
Organizations like TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In British Columbia
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
87% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Questions and answers
- Who funds TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY?
- TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY (British Columbia) receives grants from 30 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$1,240,910 to it, the largest being BRITISH COLUMBIA REHABILITATION FOUNDATION (C$264,500). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY have?
- Canada Revenue Agency filings report 30 organizations giving C$1,240,910 in grants to TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY, 14 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY?
- BRITISH COLUMBIA REHABILITATION FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$264,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like TFL TECHNOLOGY FOR LIVING SOCIETY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in British Columbia.
These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 30 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register