Skip to content
← Canadian charities

Ontario · Registered charity

10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE

10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE (Ontario) receives grants from 14 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$705,899 to it, the largest being HELEN MCCREA PEACOCK FOUNDATION (C$513,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$146k
Revenue FY2024
14
Funders on record
C$706k
Grants received
C$139k
Net assets
8/14 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE is better cushioned than half of the 184 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−0% · below the median
Months of reserve11.0mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 184 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$68k) Expenses 100 (C$62k)2018 Revenue 126 (C$86k) Expenses 95 (C$58k)2019 Revenue 106 (C$72k) Expenses 100 (C$62k) Net assets 100 (C$73k)2020 Revenue 75 (C$51k) Expenses 25 (C$16k) Net assets 155 (C$114k)2021 Revenue 33 (C$22k) Expenses 6 (C$4k) Net assets 174 (C$127k)2022 Revenue 61 (C$42k) Expenses 146 (C$90k) Net assets 108 (C$79k)2023 Revenue 243 (C$165k) Expenses 177 (C$109k) Net assets 148 (C$109k)2024 Revenue 215 (C$146k) Expenses 237 (C$147k) Net assets 190 (C$139k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (215)Expenses (237)Net assets (190)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 26% · 2019 7% · 2020 10% · 2022 62% · 2023 78% · 2024 52%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

92% of 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (25% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 179 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

C$6k
’17
C$27k
’18
C$10k
’19
C$36k
’20
C$18k
’21
−C$48k
’22
C$56k
’23
−C$565
’24
11
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 6 funders, grant income fell C$68k → C$25k.

From the CRA filings of 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 73% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE.

73%
largest funder
90%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 98% · 2018 92% · 2019 61% · 2020 97% · 2021 47% · 2022 70% · 2023 40% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

36% of 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 57% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

97% of 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE's grant income comes from Ontario funders.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Ontario out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$8k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 14 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$76k
18
19
20
22
23
24
  • 52% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ontario

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE?
10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE (Ontario) receives grants from 14 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$705,899 to it, the largest being HELEN MCCREA PEACOCK FOUNDATION (C$513,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 14 organizations giving C$705,899 in grants to 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE?
HELEN MCCREA PEACOCK FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$513,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like 10 000 TREES FOR THE ROUGE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ontario.

Play a game about who funds 10 000 Trees for the Rouge →

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 14 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register