Armstrong, BC · Charitable organization
Zion United Church
Congregational worship; adult choir; men's breakfast group; hospital care facility and individual pastoral care; support of makenzie camp; weddings; funerals; support of community food bank; hosting of community good food box; breakway toddlers play group; hosting of aa and scouts canada cubs; drop in book nook; monthly community…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA MISSION AND SERVICE FUND | C$5,048 |
| MACKENZIE CAMP SOCIETY | C$2,518 |
| OKANAGAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB DBA ARMSTRONG FOOD BANK | C$2,395 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA7× · 2017–2024 · C$46k · revenue +22%
- MCMACKENZIE CAMP SOCIETY3× · 2017–2019 · C$8k · revenue -2%
- OBOKANAGAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS DBA ARMSTRONG FOOD BANK4× · 2020–2024 · C$8k
Funded once
- TCTHE CANADIAN RED CROSSone grant, 2021 · C$930 · revenue -22%
- FUFIRST UNITED CHURCH COMMUNITY MINISTRY SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · C$200 · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.