Maple, ON · Charitable organization
Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church
We hold worship services weekly.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Olive Branch For Children | C$6,470 |
| Eastern Synod - ELCiC | C$5,325 |
| The Scott Mission | C$200 |
| Vaughan Food Bank | C$155 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +167% since the first grant, against +108% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$155 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TOThe Olive Branch For Children6× · 2018–2023 · C$26k
- ESEastern Synod - ELCiC7× · 2017–2023 · C$22k · revenue -14%
- TSThe Scott Mission6× · 2018–2023 · C$1k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- TOTHE OLIVE BRANCH FOR CHILDRENgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +27%
- HHHill House Hospicegraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$100 · revenue +108%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.