Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Yonge-Rosedale Charitable Foundation

Chaplin support and capital improvement at nisbet lodge ( qualifed donee) program support at sim canada (qualified donee).

C$524k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$169k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$1k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$55k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$468k
C$149,440
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NISBEL-LODGE-MCLINTOCK MANOR FOUNDATIONC$169,000
SIM CANADAC$150,000
POWER TO CHANGEC$149,440
CANADIAN BIBLE STUDYC$40,000
SCRIPTURE UNIONC$15,000
FELLOWSHIP TOWERS FOUNDATIONC$1,011
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.4M · 3 repeat orgsC$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$1.4M
C$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$56k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    Nisbet-Lodge-McClintock Manor Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$717k · revenue +44% · 76% of their budget
  • SC
    SIM Canada
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$444k · revenue +11%
  • PT
    POWER TO CHANGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$237k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • CB
    CANADIAN BIBLE STUDY
    one grant, 2024 · C$40k · revenue 0%
  • SU
    SCRIPTURE UNION
    one grant, 2024 · C$15k
  • FT
    FELLOWSHIP TOWERS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · C$1k · revenue 0% · 100% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNisbet-Lodge-McClintock Manor Foundation — C$717,000 over 3y, 76% of budgetSIM Canada — C$443,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPOWER TO CHANGE — C$236,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCANADIAN BIBLE STUDY — C$40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP TOWERS FOUNDATION — C$1,011 over 1y, 100% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 119306173:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Yonge-Rosedale’s filings →