Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

North York, ON · Charitable organization

Yismah Moshe Hevraj Pinto Charitable Society of Ontario

Sponsoring of rabbis for advanced talmudical studies and rabinical ordination and offering schollarships to talmudical students support and maintain a synagogue as a place of worship seminars to the public for the awareness of the religious customs based on shpharadi jewish cultures of the middle east and north africa.

C$137k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$62k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$6k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$70k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$62k
C$47,300
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAT ZOLOH TORONTOC$62,000
KOLLEL YAD YOSEFC$47,300
CAISSE BETH YOUSSEFC$22,400
MAGI FOUNDATIONC$5,626
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$506k · 19 repeat orgsC$325k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

C$506k
C$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+24%

Still filing today

84%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$68k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KY
    KOLLEL YAD YOSEF
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$72k · revenue +88%
  • OC
    OHR CHAYA
    4× · 2018–2021 · C$72k · revenue +210%
  • KD
    KOLEL DAF YOMI
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$60k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FUND
    one grant, 2023 · C$106k · revenue +11%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$37k · revenue +92%
  • R
    RYF
    one grant, 2023 · C$31k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
3
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
4
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
5
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
6
Ohr Torah
—
7
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
8
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
9
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
10
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
11
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
12
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congregation Chasidei Bobov and the most unlike its peers is Ottawa Hospital Research Institute/ Institut De Recherche De L'hopital D'ottawa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FUND — C$106,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEL YAD YOSEF — C$72,300 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetOHR CHAYA — C$71,855 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetHAT ZOLOH TORONTO — C$62,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetKOLEL DAF YOMI — C$60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA MISHKAN YOSEF — C$54,400 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetBETH JACOB — C$44,337 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE — C$37,100 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCAISSE BETH YOUSSEF — C$36,700 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetKETER TORAH — C$33,360 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetRYF — C$31,050 over 1y, 19% of budgetBETH OLOTH — C$26,189 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAT SHALOM — C$18,116 over 1y, 12% of budgetMEOHR BAIS YAAKOV — C$13,400 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYESODEI HATORAH — C$11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM — C$10,260 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKHAL AVREICHIM — C$7,770 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRE SEPHARADE LAVALLE — C$7,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetVAAD — C$7,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTORONTO CHEDER — C$6,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNER ISRAEL — C$6,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAGI FOUNDATION — C$5,626 over 1y, 13% of budgetWATERBURY — C$3,600 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetYESHIVA ZICHRON — C$3,260 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHOUVA ISRAEL — C$3,120 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetAHAVAS TORAH — C$3,052 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAGUDAT ISRAEL — C$2,482 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOR CHAIM — C$1,800 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRAMBAM MAIMONIDES — C$1,800 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBETH CHABAD — C$1,660 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOBOV — C$1,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBNAI TZION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUT EY HOPITAL — C$602 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

J & H Feldman Charita…Rayjo Charitable TrustLinas Tzedek Charitab…Fieldgate Cares Found…The F&R Hauer Charita…Heitner Charitable Fo…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Nathan & Shani Bleema…The Koenig Family Fou…The B&C Zy Gezunt Cha…My Charity FundShimon & Deena Smursz…
J & H Feldman Charitable FoundationON14.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Linas Tzedek Charitable Foundation · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Nathan & Shani Bleeman Charitable Foundation · The Koenig Family Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · Shimon & Deena Smursz Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-04-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 881342919:2024-04-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Yismah Moshe Hevraj Pinto Charitable Society of Ontario’s filings →