Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

C$139k
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$8k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,700
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$7,500
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$7,500
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$7,500
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$7,500
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$7,500
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$7,500
KOLLEL OHODEI YOM TOVC$7,500
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$7,500
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$7,500
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$7,200
KOLLEI OHOLEI YOM TOVC$6,500
KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOVC$6,500
THE JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$6,000
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$5,150
ACHIM TORONTOC$3,405
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$602k · 14 repeat orgsC$126k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

C$602k
C$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
0%

Still filing today

93%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$144k · revenue +423%
  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLA BRIGEPORT
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$102k · revenue +335%
  • KO
    KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOV
    2× · 2018–2024 · C$85k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BEIS MEIRgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$74k · revenue +51%
  • KA
    Kollel Avrechim
    one grant, 2017 · C$17k · revenue -35%
  • SZ
    SHAREI ZION PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · C$7k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
2
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
3
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
4
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
5
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
7
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
8
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
9
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
10
Eitz Chaim Schools

Eitz chaim operates schools for religious instruction and education of children from nursery school to grade eight for the purpose of their advancement in the jewish religion.

—
11
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
12
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Opera Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$144,390 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA BRIGEPORT — C$101,800 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetKOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOV — C$84,515 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetCONGREGATION BEIS MEIR — C$73,512 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetYESODEI HATOPRAH — C$40,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY — C$39,535 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetKollel Avrechim — C$16,912 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$14,100 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOV — C$12,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHIM TORONTO — C$9,930 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTORONTO CHEDER — C$9,650 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$9,574 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHAREI ZION PRESCHOOL — C$6,893 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA BNEIZION — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS DOVID CONGREGATION — C$5,700 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBNOS CHAYA — C$3,660 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF TORONTO — C$3,195 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY — C$3,018 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEVE YERUSHALIM — C$2,650 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTORATH EMETH CONG — C$2,525 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCFFC — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOC — C$750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNEI ZION — C$475 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV — C$470 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZICHRON BINYOMIN CHARITY FOUNDATION — C$209 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA ZICHRON SHMAYAHU — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dan-Hytman Family…Zolty Charitable Foun…The George Hofstedter…The Chaim Moshe Fried…Heitner Charitable Fo…The Mesora Charitable…The Rothschild Charit…The Gross Family Foun…The B&C Zy Gezunt Cha…J & H Feldman Charita…The Friedberg Charita…Moral Arc Foundation
The Dan-Hytman Family FoundationON16.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dan-Hytman Family Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Heitner Charitable Foundation · The Mesora Charitable Foundation · The Rothschild Charitable Foundation · The Gross Family Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 132743824:2024-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi’s filings →