Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

North York, ON · Charitable organization

Yeshiva Gedola Bridgeport of Canada Foundation

To provide religious educational programs and financial assistance in the form of scholarships to students to assist in the cost of educational programs courses and classes in judaic studies at institutions of higher learning.

C$109k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$51k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$6k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$53k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$51k
C$12,600
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$14k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHUC$50,500
YESHIVA B'NEI ZION OF TORONTOC$40,000
YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORAC$12,600
YESHIVA MISHKAN YOSEFC$4,000
BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOLC$1,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$585k · 7 repeat orgsC$6k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

C$585k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+33%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$276k · revenue +53%
  • YB
    YESHIVA B'NEI ZION OF TORONTO
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$220k · revenue +18%
  • YY
    YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$58k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • MB
    Mesivta Birchas Shumelgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue +102%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAICA STUDIES
    one grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue -33%
  • TE
    THORNHILL EDUCATION CENTREgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$500 · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
3
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
4
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
5
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
7
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
8
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
9
Mesorah Montessori School

Advance the teachings of the jewish faith religious tenets and doctrines.

—
10
Torah Research Academy

To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders

—
11
Yeshiva of Hamilton

Religious school

—
12
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora and the most unlike its peers is Toronto Cheder. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU — C$275,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetYESHIVA B'NEI ZION OF TORONTO — C$220,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetYESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA — C$57,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA MISHKAN YOSEF — C$15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE JOE DWEK OHR HAEMET SEPHADIC SCHOOL — C$8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Toronto Cheder — C$4,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS NEFESH DOVAID — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMesivta Birchas Shumel — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAICA STUDIES — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHORNHILL EDUCATION CENTRE — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The B&C Zy Gezunt Cha…The Weitz Family Foun…Jack and Doris Bistri…Moral Arc FoundationThe F&R Hauer Charita…Heitner Charitable Fo…Rayjo Charitable TrustJewish Foundation of …My Charity FundCanadahelps Canadon
The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable FoundationON8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · The Weitz Family Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · My Charity Fund · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 841455454:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Yeshiva Gedola Bridgeport of Canada’s filings →