Wasaga Beach, ON · Charitable organization
World Worship Revival Centre
We conduct weekly worship meetings we hold various weekly bible studies we conduct workshops and conferences
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SINGING WATERS | C$1,000 |
| VICTORY CHURCH INTERNATIONAL | C$300 |
| THE 700 CLUB | C$275 |
| HOPE CHAPEL | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$400 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TOTRUMPET OF TRUTH CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES2× · 2020–2021 · C$7k · revenue +59%
- SWSINGING WATERS MINISTRIES2× · 2021–2024 · C$2k · revenue +650%
- 7C700 CLUB CANADA5× · 2017–2024 · C$1k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- OBOpen Bible Faith Fellowship Of Canadagraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +42%
- TRThe River International Churchone grant, 2018 · C$600 · revenue +2%
- MFMY FRIENDS HOUSEone grant, 2021 · C$600 · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Church Seminars Special Services Sunday Meetings
Preaching and bible study - telephone prayer meeting and evangelism
Worship services - Sundays Prayer meetings - Wednesdays
Evangelical ministry
Conducting spiritual counseling for individuals and groups as the initial phase of establishing a new church.
Church services programs television ministry (living truth) and global missions
Provides counselling services retreats workshops consultation podcasting personal mentoring and christian faith formation.
Religious teachings in various locales prayer ministry
Worsip services. bible studies prayer meetings counsel members experiencing problems hosting radio gospel shows. hosting the weekly tv show miracle moments evangelism
Advancing the Kingdom of God through Soul Winning evangelism outreaches and Church planting. Worship & bible study. Provides aid to Peace House International Satellite Churches in 5 countries. Provide aid to low-income persons. Counselling…
Religious instruction counseling congregational worship evangelism and outreach
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Chapel and the most unlike its peers is My Friend's House Collingwood Crisis Centre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUMPET OF TRUTH CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SINGING WATERS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds 700 CLUB CANADA ↗
- Who funds Open Bible Faith Fellowship Of Canada ↗
- Who funds The River International Church ↗
- Who funds MY FRIENDS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds EZRA CANADA ↗
- Who funds VICTORY CHURCH INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds LIFE INTERNATIONAL CHURCH/LIFE CHURCH MUSKOKA ↗
- Who funds HOPE CHAPEL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.